By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The user’s email notification has been successfully saved, allowing for daily updates on the specified subject. These daily notifications will only be delivered if new matching items are available. Should any issues arise during the saving process, an error message will be displayed. Users should note that these notifications are designed to provide a single, daily update, ensuring timely information delivery.
Read the original article here
7th US Boat Strike: The United States has confirmed a seventh strike in the southern Caribbean, killing three more alleged “narco-terrorists”, bringing the total death toll of the US military’s lethal boat strikes since September to 32. Okay, so let’s just break this down, shall we? The headline, if you swapped out “US” for, say, “China” or “Russia,” would immediately trigger a completely different emotional response. It’s hard to imagine being okay with that kind of announcement if it were anyone else.
This whole situation feels like it’s teetering on the edge of a war crimes tribunal. That thought alone is pretty unsettling. And the term “narco-terrorist” feels… Orwellian. It’s a loaded term designed to instantly demonize the targets. Even if these individuals *were* involved in drug smuggling, that’s still an ordinary crime, not an act of terrorism. It feels like they’re trying to manufacture a pretext for something bigger.
It’s hard not to think that this is more about something other than stopping drugs. It feels like someone wants to pick a fight, to start a war. They’ll keep doing this, upping the ante, until they provoke a response, a reason to escalate. And the way they’re doing it, with no due process, no transparency, just labeling and bombing… it’s just not normal. Thirty-two extrajudicial executions since September? That’s not okay.
Where’s the evidence? If they’re so sure these people are “narco-terrorists,” why aren’t they releasing names? It’s suspicious, to say the least. And that claim about fentanyl busts saving lives? It feels like the kind of exaggerated rhetoric designed to sway public opinion and justify this kind of extreme action. It honestly looks like state terrorism. It feels like a bully, poking and prodding, hoping someone will lash out so they can say “They started it.”
The idea that the US is playing judge, jury, and executioner, especially in international waters, is chilling. And there’s got to be concerns about target selection. Are they even sure who’s on these boats? It’s a disturbing trend, and it should scare everyone.
The fact that other countries, like the Netherlands and France, are suddenly increasing coast guard patrols in the same area is very telling. They likely know the truth about what’s going on with these boats. And the whole “alleged” part of the statement, that’s key, isn’t it? It means these people haven’t been proven guilty of anything. They are being killed because they are suspected of a crime. It’s murder, pure and simple.
What is the US doing? It feels like they’re intentionally trying to create conflict, perhaps using it as an excuse to maintain or expand their power. The talk of the Hague and Nobel Prizes feels darkly ironic in this context. And the idea of “peace through strength,” it’s a dangerous philosophy. History teaches us that violence begets violence.
The thought of trials in the coming years, like some kind of dystopian Avengers movie, is both inevitable and terrifying. This is terrorism. The US is openly murdering people in international waters, and it feels like a path towards war with some South American country is being laid.
Even if we consider stopping fentanyl, is it a reason for this kind of action? Is this how you stop the flow of illegal narcotics? It’s not. There’s too much money involved and always will be, and it’s likely that influential people in the US are profiting from the trade.
Then there is the question of what to do if the suspected boats are approached. Why not board the boats? Why don’t they seize the evidence? Is it just too easy to just kill everyone and move on? What is the real agenda behind this all? If they captured survivors alive and then let them go, what are they hiding? It’s all a big mess.
And let’s not forget the bigger picture. Are they even considering the criteria for these killings? It’s a huge question. And the sudden appearance of other countries’ patrol boats? It makes you wonder how long the international community is going to put up with this. Because, at some point, other countries are going to intervene, and then things could really explode.