By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Tuesday that the U.S. military conducted three strikes in the eastern Pacific Ocean, targeting boats suspected of carrying drugs, which resulted in 14 fatalities and one survivor. These actions, carried out off the coast of Colombia, represent an escalation in the pace of attacks in South American waters that began in early September. Footage of the strikes was released, showing vessels exploding, while the survivor’s location was passed to the U.S. Coast Guard and Mexican military. Hegseth has drawn parallels between the military’s actions against drug trafficking and the war on terrorism, with the Trump administration providing no evidence to support claims about the boats or the people killed.
Read the original article here
Hegseth says US carried out 3 strikes on alleged drug-running boats in eastern Pacific, killing 14. This news, as it stands, is deeply troubling, and the immediate reaction is one of serious concern. The core issue boils down to the legality, morality, and potential danger of these actions, particularly the apparent lack of transparency and due process. It feels like we’re being presented with a grim situation – extrajudicial killings, plain and simple. Where is the evidence? The absence of proof casts a long shadow, transforming these events into acts of murder. Even with evidence, the scenario remains disturbing.
Hegseth says US carried out 3 strikes on alleged drug-running boats in eastern Pacific, killing 14, and the lack of transparency is particularly galling. It forces one to question the methods used. Why not pursue the established legal channels? Arrest the suspected drug smugglers? Interrogate them to gather intelligence? Surely, that approach could yield more valuable information about the operations and networks involved. Instead, the narrative presented seems to favor the immediate destruction of life, creating more questions than answers. It appears we’re bypassing fundamental principles of justice, and this should not be tolerated.
Hegseth says US carried out 3 strikes on alleged drug-running boats in eastern Pacific, killing 14, and the context of the location adds another layer of complexity, especially when considering the potential for innocent lives being lost. The “alleged” nature of the activity is critical, highlighting the risk of mistaken identity or flawed intelligence. When you’re dealing with “alleged” activities, the presumption of innocence should be paramount. The thought of this happening is unsettling and makes you wonder if there’s any accountability, any way to verify the claims being made. The lack of proof fuels the feeling that these were indiscriminate killings, with the blanket excuse of drug trafficking being used as cover.
Hegseth says US carried out 3 strikes on alleged drug-running boats in eastern Pacific, killing 14, and the fact that we’re talking about extrajudicial killings raises serious questions about the direction our country is headed in. The very fact that these incidents are happening raises ethical concerns and the possibility of war crimes. There’s a real fear of where this could lead, especially as it relates to the potential for abuse of power. The word “alleged” feels like a smokescreen, designed to obscure the reality of the situation. It’s a reminder of the need for the rule of law and the importance of holding those in power accountable.
Hegseth says US carried out 3 strikes on alleged drug-running boats in eastern Pacific, killing 14, and the question of cost, both in terms of money and ethical standing, can’t be ignored. The financial resources spent on missiles and strikes, while the lives of the people who died are being disregarded. And if it turns out the intelligence was faulty, the damage to our reputation could be irreparable. We need to remember the weight of these actions, the lasting impact they have on our moral compass. The notion of the military using advanced weaponry on suspected drug runners evokes images of a video game, detached from the human cost.
Hegseth says US carried out 3 strikes on alleged drug-running boats in eastern Pacific, killing 14, and there are unsettling implications for the future, with the potential for these kinds of actions becoming normalized. The normalization of targeting of so-called “terrorists” could, unfortunately, lead to a chilling outcome. In the end, we should all be concerned about the trajectory our country is taking. The lack of due process, the absence of any real oversight, and the constant invocation of “alleged” activities paint a disturbing picture. It is up to the people to hold those in power accountable.