By Matt Underwood Johnson defends calling anti-Trump protests “hate America” rallies. Let’s be clear; this is a loaded statement and the core of the issue at hand. The accusation itself is a bold one, immediately framing any opposition as fundamentally unpatriotic. This instantly shuts down a lot of potential discussion, painting those protesting as enemies of the nation, rather than citizens exercising their right to voice dissent. The reality, judging by what people are saying, paints a different picture.
The common experience seems to be a complete disconnect between Johnson’s narrative and the reality on the ground. Many participants in these rallies reported seeing primarily American flags, symbols of national pride, not symbols of hatred. They weren’t desecrating the flag or burning the anthem; they were waving the very emblems of the country they were allegedly despising. The marches were filled with veterans, with people fighting for what they believed the country stood for, not against it. This isn’t the behavior of people who hate America; it’s the behavior of people who love America, but hate what they see happening to it.
The very idea of a “hate America” rally seems incongruous with the core message many protesters are expressing. They’re not attacking the country itself; they’re directing their anger at specific individuals, policies, and actions they believe are detrimental to the nation’s values. It’s a distinction that Johnson and his supporters seem determined to blur. People are expressing a frustration with the current state of affairs, with the actions of specific individuals and groups in power, not with the nation itself. Many say, “I hate my government,” a sentiment that, while strong, doesn’t equate to hating the country.
One of the biggest issues is the accusation of violence. Where is the evidence? The account is that the rallies have been overwhelmingly peaceful. While there may be some rhetorical excesses, the emphasis on the First Amendment and the right to protest seems a priority, which is consistent with the exercise of the greatest right Americans have. If there are videos and photos of rhetoric, calling for a president’s removal, or suggesting that fascists must die, as has been insinuated by the same individuals making these claims, then isn’t it in effect admitting their belief that the president is a fascist? It is a strong allegation; if there’s no widespread violence or vandalism, then what is this all about?
The focus of the protestors seems to be the very issues that are eroding the foundations of American democracy, like the January 6th insurrection, an event that, ironically, Johnson seems to downplay. It’s a fundamental misunderstanding of the motivations of the people involved. It is a sign of authoritarian tendencies, not patriotism.
The criticism of Johnson isn’t about being unpatriotic; it’s about holding those in power accountable. It’s about ensuring the government operates within the bounds of the Constitution and respects the will of the people. It’s about protecting the values that define America, and not letting the country become something it’s not. This isn’t about hating America; it’s about fighting for America.