By Matt Underwood The GOP governor candidate’s declaration that firing people for being gay isn’t discrimination, coupled with her view of homosexuality as an “immoral lifestyle choice” and her belief that such firings should be legal, is a stark and troubling stance. It’s difficult to process this position without immediately recognizing the fundamental misunderstanding of both discrimination and the very nature of sexual orientation.
It’s plainly obvious, and legally recognized, that firing someone simply because of their sexual orientation *is* discrimination. To state otherwise is to disregard the established protections that exist, and it directly contradicts the principle of equal opportunity. The claim that this isn’t discrimination is a direct challenge to these principles. It seems to be a statement about what she *wants* the world to be, not what the world *is*.
And let’s be clear: being gay isn’t a “choice.” It’s a fundamental aspect of a person’s identity, like their race or ethnicity. The rhetoric that frames it as a lifestyle choice is rooted in prejudice, and it reflects an attempt to stigmatize and marginalize a significant portion of the population. It’s an attempt to strip away fundamental rights and protections, simply based on who someone is.
The language used here is not just dismissive; it’s dehumanizing. Framing homosexuality as “immoral” opens the door to justify all sorts of discriminatory actions. If an employer is allowed to fire someone for being gay, what’s next? Can they also refuse to hire someone because they are married, or because they are a member of a particular religion? Where does it end? It is a slippery slope. It’s the kind of thinking that leads to all sorts of dangerous outcomes.
It’s frankly baffling that a candidate for high office would so openly embrace such a regressive and outdated position. The repercussions of such views are not merely theoretical; they have real-world consequences for LGBTQ+ individuals. It fosters environments of hostility and fear, and it can lead to tangible harm, not just in the workplace but also in other facets of life. What will she say about other people, if she is willing to say this?
This stance also highlights a fundamental disconnect between the candidate and a significant portion of the population, especially the younger generations. Such views are increasingly out of step with mainstream social values. It’s a reminder that there are still many who hold these hateful views, and that these views can gain some amount of traction within certain political circles.
The candidate’s actions, including her statements about marriage equality, add fuel to the fire. In her view, there is no reason why gays should be allowed the same rights that every other group in the country has. It becomes even more concerning when you consider the potential influence this could have on policy.
The fact that this candidate is currently in a position of power, serving as Lieutenant Governor, is deeply concerning. It’s a demonstration of the reach and persistence of such outdated beliefs. It’s something that everyone should know and consider while voting. The rhetoric of hate and discrimination has far-reaching implications.
This whole situation is absurd. When it’s the pedophile party talking about morality, you know something is amiss. The GOP seems to be filled with individuals who lack the understanding of basic human rights.