Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has publicly voiced strong criticism of progressivism, deeming it an existential threat to the foundational principles of the United States. Speaking at the University of Texas at Austin Law School, Thomas asserted that a spirit of “cynicism, rejection, hostility and animus” toward America pervades the nation, placing blame on “intellectuals” and higher education institutions for diminishing founding values. He argued that progressivism seeks to replace the Declaration of Independence’s premise of God-given rights with the notion that rights originate from government, fostering subservience incompatible with constitutional ideals. Thomas also expressed concern over Washington officials who he believes lack commitment to core tenets such as free enterprise and the Constitution’s original meaning, often masking their failures as pragmatic institutionalism. He concluded with a call for Americans to emulate the courage of the Declaration’s signers to secure the nation’s future.
Read More
The Tennessee legislature has passed the Charlie Kirk Act, which, if signed into law, will prohibit public higher education institutions from barring speakers with bigoted views and punish students who protest them. This legislation mandates that schools adopt the University of Chicago’s Freedom of Expression Policy, which asserts that institutions should not shield individuals from offensive ideas. Prohibited actions by students and faculty include disruptive protest tactics such as noise-making or staging walk-outs, with violations potentially leading to probation, suspension, or expulsion. The bill’s sponsor claims it is named after Charlie Kirk for his defense of free expression, despite Kirk’s history of controversial and anti-LGBTQ+ statements.
Read More
Grindr is making a notable foray into the political social scene, announcing plans to host its inaugural White House Correspondents’ Dinner party. This move marks a significant moment, placing the popular LGBTQ+ dating app within the orbit of a high-profile Washington D.C. event traditionally focused on journalism and politics. The app’s CEO has expressed a desire for Grindr to be a platform for everyone, irrespective of their political leanings, a sentiment that resonates with the idea of inclusivity.
However, the reality of the current political climate presents a stark contrast to such an ideal. There are prominent voices within a particular political party that have openly advocated for the exclusion, and at times, the harm of gay Americans.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court has ruled against Colorado’s ban on “conversion therapy” for LGBTQ+ youth, finding it raises free speech concerns under the First Amendment. In an 8-1 decision, the majority sided with a Christian counselor who argued the law censors speech based on viewpoint. This ruling is expected to impact similar laws in other states, while Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, arguing states should be able to regulate healthcare.
Read More
A recent halachic document signed by 75 Orthodox rabbis and rabbanit condemns conversion therapy, citing its harm, ineffectiveness, and the understanding that same-sex attraction is not a mental health issue. The document calls for acceptance and inclusion, emphasizing that these practices cause deep psychological harm and contradict the commandment to love one’s neighbor. The signatories, who consulted with LGBTQ individuals, assert that the focus should be on respecting individuals rather than attempting to change their core identities. The movement, spearheaded by figures like Rabbi Aviya Rozen, signifies a shift towards understanding and embracing LGBTQ individuals within the religious community.
Read More
A Boston judge has ruled in favor of a father who sued his local school district to prevent his son’s exposure to LGBTQ+-themed books. The father, citing religious objections, argued his son shouldn’t be subjected to materials that contradict his family’s beliefs. Judge Saylor, referencing a Supreme Court precedent, granted a preliminary injunction, mandating the school district accommodate the father’s request and provide alternative instruction. The district’s lawyers, however, plan to defend against these claims, emphasizing the lack of direct exposure and the impracticality of such opt-out demands.
Read More
A year after Texas implemented a policy blocking transgender residents from updating their state IDs, the state has compiled a list containing information on over 100 individuals who attempted to do so. The Texas Department of Public Safety gathered the names and license numbers of these individuals, sending them to a specific agency email account, though the exact purpose of this list remains undisclosed. Despite requests for clarification, state officials have not revealed the rationale behind collecting this data, nor if it is shared with other agencies. This action raises concerns among advocates, who fear the list might be used to further restrict the rights of transgender Texans, especially given recent legislation defining gender on state documents and limiting restroom access.
Read More
Judge Dianne Hensley of Waco, Texas, is challenging the constitutionality of marriage equality in a federal lawsuit, claiming the Supreme Court’s decision “subordinated” state law. Hensley, who has refused to perform same-sex marriages citing religious beliefs, argues this position should be protected despite violating state judicial ethics rules. This legal battle follows years of proceedings, including a warning from the Texas Commission on Judicial Conduct and support from the Texas Attorney General. Hensley’s current lawsuit seeks to prevent the commission from investigating or disciplining her for her discriminatory practices, claiming her rights as a Christian are being violated.
Read More
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has established a tip line to report suspected violations of the state’s bathroom ban, which mandates public building restroom use based on birth-assigned sex. Paxton claims the law protects women and girls, despite research showing no increased safety risk from transgender individuals using gender-affirming facilities. The law, which carries hefty fines for non-compliant institutions, has already caused issues, like student relocations at the University of Texas San Antonio. Critics, including the ACLU, argue the tip line promotes privacy violations and over-policing based on gender.
Read More
Attorney General Pam Bondi has instructed the FBI to implement a cash reward system for information leading to the arrest of leaders of “domestic terrorist organizations,” a definition now encompassing groups associated with “radical gender ideology,” according to a leaked December 4 memo. This directive operationalizes a September National Security Presidential Memorandum, prioritizing investigations and prosecutions tied to an expanded definition of domestic terrorism. The memo flags ideologies such as adherence to “radical gender ideology,” along with positions favoring mass migration and anti-capitalism. Critics argue that the language targets LGBTQ+ communities, potentially encouraging informants to report on peaceful activists based on political affiliations rather than evidence of violence. The memo also orders federal agencies to provide intelligence on “Antifa-aligned” groups, compile a list of potentially terroristic organizations, and publicize the domestic-terrorism tip line.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood