The CIA is playing a central role in the Trump administration’s lethal air strikes against suspected drug-carrying boats in the Caribbean Sea, providing real-time intelligence from satellites and intercepts to identify targets. Although the U.S. military carries out the actual missile strikes, the CIA’s intelligence gathering is critical in recommending which vessels to target. Because the CIA’s intelligence is not designed to be public or used as legal evidence, the sources and methods used for selecting targets will likely remain secret. Experts express concern that such strikes on civilian targets may be illegal under international law.
Read the original article here
The CIA playing the most important part in US strikes in the Caribbean, that’s what we’re talking about here. It’s a pretty heavy statement, isn’t it? It immediately conjures up images of shadow operations, covert missions, and potentially, a lot more than meets the eye. Let’s just say, the idea of the CIA being the main player in this part of the world isn’t exactly a surprise, considering its history. You can’t help but wonder what the true objectives are.
Extrajudicial killings, the kind the CIA is known for, are a serious matter, and while the military has rules and regulations, the CIA often operates in a gray area. There’s a strong sentiment that this isn’t just about stopping drug trafficking. When you start targeting fishing boats and releasing survivors, it raises questions. It suggests a more complex game is being played, perhaps even one with ulterior motives. And if the goal is to destabilize Venezuela as a pretext for regime change, as some suggest, that’s a whole other level of geopolitical maneuvering.
The so-called “War on Drugs” has been an utter failure, and the argument that these attacks are just another chapter in that saga seems plausible. Billions of dollars have been spent, and countless lives have been lost, yet the flow of drugs continues unabated. The CIA has a habit of messing things up, but at the core, their missions have always been about control. If the agency is now focusing on the Caribbean, it may be because there are strategic, economic, or political factors at play. The agency is always interested in gaining a certain edge, and if it means getting involved in a conflict in the Western Hemisphere, so be it.
The very idea that a “criminal president” might want to start a war to deflect from their own crimes adds another layer to this situation. It brings to mind movies like *Clear and Present Danger*, where things aren’t always what they seem. Planting drugs, manipulating events – it’s all part of the playbook. There’s speculation that the attacks might be nothing more than political theater.
And then there’s the question of the CIA’s current state. Are we looking at an agency staffed with people who understand the real-world implications of their actions, or just a bunch of yes-men who are just as clueless as everyone else? The fact that information about these “covert” operations seems to be leaking so freely is worrying. What happens when the public finds out about war crimes?
Considering Trump’s brags about the situation in Venezuela, it’s clear the US is applying pressure. The comment about being scared to fish is particularly telling. It points to a situation where the US might be trying to control the region using threats. The idea of the CIA just “doing CIA things” is both concerning and probably correct. It also feels like there’s an increasing sense of impunity, a feeling that no one is accountable.
If the goal is regime change, as has been suggested, that brings forth a disturbing prospect of international conflict. The thought of invading a country in the south and risking sanctions and a powder keg situation is a scary one. With all the back-and-forth about Trump’s motives, it’s hard to separate what’s real from what’s just meant to rally support.
The fact that the attacks are supposedly being done to destroy drug cartels is worth questioning. It’s hard to imagine, given past events, that the intelligence apparatus of the United States would ever cause harm. The idea of the CIA toppling a Latin American government isn’t new. It’s a recurring theme in the history of the Americas, and if the CIA is involved, you can bet that this is nothing more than just the latest installment.
Ultimately, the revelation that the CIA is playing the “most important part” in US strikes in the Caribbean doesn’t really surprise. It’s a reflection of the deep-seated power struggles and geopolitical games being played out behind the scenes.
