By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a press conference, President Trump asserted that negative media coverage of him is “really illegal,” arguing that it constitutes cheating rather than free speech. He cited the high percentage of unfavorable stories about him as evidence of unfair treatment by news outlets, likening them to extensions of the Democratic National Committee. This stance follows the administration’s crackdown on free speech in the wake of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s death, which has drawn criticism from both liberals and some conservatives, including former President Barack Obama and Senator Ted Cruz. The administration’s actions include the firing of an MSNBC analyst and the indefinite pulling of Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show, after pressure from the FCC chairman.
Read the original article here
Trump, 79, Claims Negative Stories About Him Are ‘Illegal’
The core of the issue lies in a recent statement made by Donald Trump, where he declared that publishing negative stories about him is “really illegal.” This claim, made during a press conference, is a direct challenge to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and the press. It’s quite a bold assertion, especially considering his concurrent claim of being “a very strong person for free speech.” The situation presents a stark contrast between what he says and what he appears to believe about the principles of open expression.
Trump’s perspective seems to stem from a belief that the media is biased against him. He states that negative stories constitute a significant percentage of the coverage he receives. This perceived imbalance, according to him, amounts to cheating and a violation of free speech. He refers to his lawsuit against ABC News as an example of how media outlets are held accountable. This viewpoint doesn’t exactly align with the foundational principles of a free press, which is intended to hold those in power accountable, even if the coverage is critical.
The comments are particularly alarming because they echo sentiments often associated with authoritarian regimes. The suppression of critical voices and the control of information are hallmarks of these regimes. By suggesting that negative coverage is illegal, Trump appears to be aiming to silence his critics and control the narrative surrounding him. It’s a clear indicator of the dangers of unchecked power and the erosion of democratic norms.
His insistence on a “landslide times two” victory in the last election, right after calling it a “landslide”, further reveals a disconnect from reality. This, coupled with his claim that his popularity is high, doesn’t reconcile with his perception that a majority of the media is against him. This conflict of perceptions adds another layer to the situation, highlighting the challenges of dealing with a leader who is demonstrably out of touch with the truth.
It’s also worth noting that Trump has a history of attacking the media, often labeling unfavorable coverage as “fake news.” This rhetoric serves to undermine the credibility of journalists and news organizations, thereby potentially paving the way for the public to accept his claims about the illegality of negative reporting. This strategy is a classic tactic used by those who seek to consolidate power and control the flow of information.
Furthermore, it’s essential to address the hypocrisy inherent in his stance. While declaring himself a champion of free speech, he seems to be advocating for the suppression of opinions that differ from his own. He wants his critics silenced and is doing something eerily similar to the Enabling Act. The true test of a commitment to free speech lies in the willingness to tolerate even the most critical and unfavorable opinions.
The potential consequences of this position are significant. If such views become accepted, it could lead to a chilling effect on journalism, with news outlets hesitant to report critically on the President or his administration. This, in turn, could undermine the ability of the public to be informed about crucial issues and hold those in power accountable. This erosion of free speech can have lasting effects on the health of a democracy.
In essence, the situation raises critical questions about the limits of free speech, the role of the media, and the potential for authoritarian tendencies in modern politics. Trump’s comments are not just about him; they are about the fundamental principles upon which American society is built. It’s a reminder that these principles require constant vigilance and defense against those who seek to undermine them.