By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A landmark lawsuit has been filed by over 100 South Korean women, accusing the US military of abuse while they were forced to work as prostitutes for US soldiers. The suit details accounts of sexual abuse and forced medical examinations, seeking compensation of 10 million won per victim, and for the first time, officially names the US military as a defendant. This case follows a 2022 ruling by South Korea’s top court, which found that the government had illegally operated brothels for the US military. The plaintiffs, who worked in state-sanctioned brothels from the 1950s to 1980s, are also holding the South Korean government liable due to existing laws that state Seoul must compensate victims of illegal acts committed by US soldiers.
Read the original article here
AFP: More than 100 South Korean women forced to work as prostitutes for US soldiers stationed in the country file landmark lawsuit. A building slated for demolition that was once called a “monkey house”, a clinic for sex workers hired to serve US soldiers.
It’s a stark and disturbing reality that over 100 South Korean women are taking legal action, a landmark lawsuit, over being forced into prostitution to serve US soldiers. The details are jarring, particularly the fact that this operation allegedly occurred within a building, infamously nicknamed the “monkey house,” which served as a clinic for sex workers. This lawsuit is about a historical injustice, reaching back to the period when brothels were effectively established and managed by the South Korean government itself. It’s mind-boggling, really. The victims are now seeking both an apology from the US armed forces and financial restitution.
The South Korean government ran these brothels; you’ve got to understand how the US soldiers, were in the loop of it. It’s understandable to question the extent of individual soldiers’ awareness, especially given the way the brothels were set up. On one hand, it’s easy to believe the official line: that some US military personnel may not have fully understood the circumstances. Some of the soldiers may have just viewed it as local businesses. But, from the testimonies of victims and from various discussions, it’s hard to ignore the possibility that the full story is a bit murkier. It’s an old story: military personnel stationed abroad and the exploitative industries that spring up around them, and the article details.
The context surrounding this situation is crucial. It’s important to remember that these brothels existed between the 1950s and the 1980s, a period marked by political instability and economic hardship. For the women involved, it was a matter of survival. The claim of an apology from the US military raises tough questions. The history of the US military and prostitution in foreign countries is not new and the topic is full of potential political landmines. It is clear that this is not the first time this has happened and that the soldiers, some of them at least, may have turned a blind eye to this.
The moral complexities of this situation are considerable. It highlights the uncomfortable truth that the US military, like any large institution, can be host to some very troubling behaviors. The article refers to the term, “bad dudes”. Given the nature of war and of military personnel, there’s likely always been a dark undercurrent of exploitation alongside acts of service. The idea that “if you don’t give these guys entertainment, they will find their own” is a difficult statement to swallow, yet it seems to be a factor, unfortunately. The presence of recreational facilities on military bases, like swimming pools and bowling alleys, does provide a disturbing point of view.
The notion of a “tradition” of sexual assault by American soldiers is chilling. The accusations of the US military turning a blind eye in Japan, allowing for sexual abuse and underreporting of such abuses in countries like Japan and the Philippines are also of course, extremely concerning. There are many issues and concerns that are tied to this. The fact that the South Korean government was involved raises a host of questions about complicity, responsibility, and the exploitation of vulnerable women. Was there any real consent involved from those women? Were they given a genuine choice? Did the soldiers even pause to consider this?
Some have suggested that it’s unfair to single out the US when the South Korean government was deeply involved. But that, it would seem, is the very point of the lawsuit. The argument appears to be that the US bears responsibility for its actions, especially since the soldiers knew the women were being trafficked and still participated. The article’s mentions of the “Comfort Women” of World War II and the role that the Japanese government took. The sad thing is, that a similar thing happened within the South Korean government, with the US military and its soldiers acting in it as the customer.
The financial component, a request for about $7,211 per victim, also brings a different reality to the table. While the South Korean government was held accountable in 2022, the suit for the United States is a clear statement. The question is about seeking recognition, acknowledging the harm done, and sending a message that these types of acts of exploitation are unacceptable. It may be a symbolic amount, but it is necessary nonetheless. It’s not a small matter to face these types of accusations.
The historical context of this situation is also vital. The post-war era was a complicated time, with the US occupying foreign nations and playing a global role in containing communism. It’s difficult to imagine that it was easy to do what was best for those women. But to see what has happened now, is an indictment of the past. It might not be about the government. It may be about greed and exploitation, and the women were just the victims. The historical context has to be acknowledged, but at the same time it cannot excuse the actions and behaviors that took place.
It’s important to note that prostitution is illegal but not harshly punished in countries like Thailand. This is not to say that trafficking and exploitation aren’t still issues. All nations are complex with their own problems. The presence of military bases in these countries has created opportunities for exploitation, with local economies catering to soldiers’ needs. What’s true is that host countries are often in a difficult position, with the US able to wield political and economic influence. This may be through providing financial support. Or, they might use less subtle means like halting aid.
In the end, this lawsuit is a painful reminder of the costs of war and occupation and, it would appear, of the ways in which the powerful have sometimes used the vulnerable. It forces us to confront the uncomfortable realities of the past and the need for accountability and justice. It shows that justice for these women isn’t just about financial compensation. It’s about acknowledging the harm done, seeking an apology, and working to ensure that such exploitation is never allowed to happen again.