In Montreal, a law firm is seeking to initiate a class-action lawsuit against grocery stores. The firm alleges that several chains have misled consumers regarding the “Made in Canada” label on their products. This potential legal action stems from concerns that some items may not meet the criteria for the label. The lawsuit aims to address potential consumer deception and ensure accurate product labeling practices.
Read the original article here
A Montrealer is indeed taking on the big grocery chains, Provigo, Metro, Sobeys, Walmart, and Giant Tiger, with a class-action lawsuit. The issue? Allegedly, they’re slapping “Made in Canada” labels on products that aren’t actually made here. Honestly, it’s pretty shady, and I can understand why people are upset. We Canadians often pay a premium to support our local farmers and businesses, and if these labels are misleading us, it’s not just consumer fraud, but it’s also hurting the producers we’re trying to support. It really does feel like a way to take advantage of consumers.
The law seems to be a bit of a grey area, doesn’t it? It’s a fact that “Prepared in Canada” and “Made in Canada” are two completely different things. The ability to legally claim a product is “Made in Canada” if the most expensive part of it is Canadian, is a loophole that doesn’t sit right. Picture this: you grab a package of frozen fish, proudly displaying “Made in Canada,” only to find out the fish itself came from China, and the box was printed here. According to the law, that’s technically “Canadian.”
It makes you realize how much food marketing and labeling are designed to influence our buying decisions. The government needs to step up and clarify the laws, making sure country of origin labeling is clear and easy to find. I’ve wasted so much time squinting at labels, searching for where something was actually made. It used to be China hiding it, but the U.S. is now doing it too. Honestly, maybe we need “Made in [Specific State]” labels for American products too, because it feels unfair to lump everyone together.
Many of us are willing to pay a little extra to support local businesses. It’s a sort of economic patriotism, a way of fighting back. To find out you’ve been duped into buying something imported? That’s disappointing. I want to buy Canadian, and I’m proud to support our country.
There are so many ways things can go wrong with labeling, and the damages might be minimal. Maybe it’s just a minimum wage worker not giving a damn, or maybe something more intentional. But at the end of the day, the grocery store is still responsible for their employees’ actions, even the ones on minimum wage. That responsibility falls on the employer. They can try to pass blame to the employee, but it’s the store on the hook.
I can see how an employee could accidentally mislabel something. It’s a hectic job, and mistakes happen. I understand, I used to work in the bakery in a grocery store and putting up those labels was always a pain in the neck. There’s a lot that goes into it. If you’re looking at the actual labels on the products, you’re probably fine, those labels are accurate. The problem is those maple leaf shelf labels in front of the products.
Some of the larger brands probably have more influence, which may lead to certain promotions. The mislabeling likely starts with the larger brands, some of whom I suspect may have products not packaged here. The store itself is not the source of the origin, just the location of the item for sale.
There’s an argument to be made that mistakes are more likely with larger brands, but it is the responsibility of the grocery chain, not the employee. There are a lot of things to consider: the label can fall off, a customer can move the item, the supplier changes the origin, classification issues, incorrect information from the supplier, recipe changes, supplier errors, and much more. So, how can the employee be blamed?
When it comes down to it, a lot of the problem is from mismanagement and a failure to follow proper protocols. The grocery store should not sell items if they cannot vet them.
