Three drivers in San Jose, California, have filed a class action lawsuit against the city and its police department, arguing that the deployment of nearly 500 Flock Safety cameras constitutes an unconstitutional search. Organized by the Institute for Justice, the suit contends that the creation of searchable databases storing vehicle movements, accessible without warrants by law enforcement, violates the Fourth Amendment. The plaintiffs seek to compel the city to delete Flock images unless a warrant is obtained, arguing the extensive data collection itself poses a significant privacy threat.
Read More
Deere & Co. has agreed to a $99 million settlement to resolve a class action lawsuit alleging monopolistic repair practices, a move that still requires court approval. The lawsuit accused the farm equipment manufacturer of withholding repair software and colluding with dealers to force farmers into using their services at inflated prices, thereby restricting market competition. While denying wrongdoing and asserting its commitment to customer repair access, Deere stated the settlement allows it to focus on serving its customers. The company also agreed to enhance the availability of repair resources and diagnostic tools, though it continues to face separate litigation from the Federal Trade Commission over similar allegations.
Read More
A significant development has occurred in the ongoing legal battles surrounding the Trump administration’s immigration detention policies, with a federal appeals court stepping in to halt nationwide rulings that had previously rejected these measures. This particular appeals court, the 9th Circuit, has indicated that the administration has presented a strong argument that a lower court wrongly certified a nationwide class action. The reasoning behind this is rooted in the idea that challenges to the validity of someone’s detention should be brought through habeas proceedings, specifically in the district where that individual is being held.
This judicial intervention creates a complex situation, as it effectively pauses the enforcement of previous court orders that had sought to limit the administration’s ability to detain immigrants without due process, such as the opportunity to seek release on bond.… Continue reading
Costco customers are finding themselves in a unique position, suing for a share of refunds stemming from tariffs imposed during the Trump administration. This situation arises because Costco, like many other retailers, was affected by these tariffs, and the subsequent government actions to potentially refund some of those payments have led to this legal entanglement. The core of the issue revolves around whether Costco customers, who ultimately bore the brunt of these tariffs, should benefit from any refunds the company might receive.
It’s understandable that customers would feel entitled to a portion of these refunds. Many likely experienced price increases on goods they purchased from Costco, or they believe that Costco absorbed costs that could have otherwise gone into customer benefits like lower prices or enhanced value.… Continue reading
A class action lawsuit alleges that hundreds of detainees at the Whipple Federal Building are being denied access to legal counsel, violating their constitutional rights. The lawsuit, filed by the Advocates for Human Rights, cites instances of violent arrests, overcrowding, and constant shackling, with detainees reportedly blocked from contacting lawyers. Furthermore, the suit claims that when detainees are permitted phone calls, ICE agents are present, and attorneys are often denied access or private consultation spaces. The plaintiffs are concerned that this lack of legal representation leads to swift removal without the opportunity to seek court intervention.
Read More
PepsiCo, Walmart hit with class action over alleged price-fixing is definitely something to unpack. It seems like the core of the issue is a class action lawsuit alleging that PepsiCo and Walmart colluded to inflate prices at other retailers, effectively giving Walmart an unfair advantage. This is not exactly shocking news in the world of big business, is it?
The essence of the claim is that PepsiCo provided Walmart with preferential wholesale pricing, while simultaneously forcing other retailers to pay higher prices for the same products. This would, if true, be a violation of antitrust laws, essentially stifling competition and potentially harming consumers who end up paying more for their favorite beverage at various stores.… Continue reading
Following a September ICE raid at a Georgia EV battery plant, Korean workers are preparing a class-action lawsuit. The workers, who were in the U.S. on business visas to train American employees, allege unlawful detention, racial profiling, and human rights violations, describing the raid as involving excessive force. The raid, which ICE called the largest-ever enforcement action at a single worksite, led to the detention of hundreds of workers before their release and return to Korea, sparking outrage and calls for clarification. Both the Korean and U.S. governments are now in talks to improve the visa system and prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.
Read More
A class-action lawsuit has been filed by New Yorkers receiving food stamps against the Trump administration in response to new work requirements taking effect soon. The plaintiffs allege the changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) were implemented too quickly and will result in thousands losing monthly food aid. The lawsuit specifically challenges the USDA’s rescinding of state and local waivers, which previously exempted recipients from work requirements. The suit is concerned about the impact on recipients who rely on the benefits, which provide a critical lifeline for many in the city.
Read More
In a recent ruling, a woman who underwent an unlawful strip search at a 2018 music festival was awarded at least $93,000 in damages. The court found that the woman’s treatment at the Splendour in the Grass Music Festival in Byron Bay was “humiliating,” leading to compensation for assault, battery, and false imprisonment. This judgement may have implications for a class action involving 3,000 people who were strip searched by NSW Police at music festivals between 2016 and 2022, potentially leading to $150 million in damages. Lawyers involved in the class action believe this ruling could render thousands of additional strip searches unlawful and are urging the state to settle with the remaining members.
Read More
In Montreal, a law firm is seeking to initiate a class-action lawsuit against grocery stores. The firm alleges that several chains have misled consumers regarding the “Made in Canada” label on their products. This potential legal action stems from concerns that some items may not meet the criteria for the label. The lawsuit aims to address potential consumer deception and ensure accurate product labeling practices.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
ICE Detainees Denied Counsel at Whipple Building: Class Action Concerns
A class action lawsuit alleges that hundreds of detainees at the Whipple Federal Building are being denied access to legal counsel, violating their constitutional rights. The lawsuit, filed by the Advocates for Human Rights, cites instances of violent arrests, overcrowding, and constant shackling, with detainees reportedly blocked from contacting lawyers. Furthermore, the suit claims that when detainees are permitted phone calls, ICE agents are present, and attorneys are often denied access or private consultation spaces. The plaintiffs are concerned that this lack of legal representation leads to swift removal without the opportunity to seek court intervention.
Read More