By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has controversially declared that filming and posting videos of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents constitutes “violence” and has threatened potential charges against those who record immigration raids, despite First Amendment protections. While the First Amendment generally protects the right to record law enforcement activities in public, the DHS’s stance has drawn criticism. This is further highlighted by incidents, such as the June arrest and detention of a PhD student who was documenting an ICE raid, who claims he was attacked by agents. The ACLU of Illinois has since clarified that recording ICE activity in public is a protected right and encourages people to do so safely.
Read the original article here
DHS says filming, posting videos of ICE agents is “doxxing,” vows prosecutions. This whole situation is raising a lot of eyebrows, and for good reason. The idea that filming and sharing videos of ICE agents could lead to prosecution is, to put it mildly, a bit concerning, especially when considering the legal landscape surrounding public recording. The Supreme Court has been pretty clear on this: filming in public is generally legal. You’re allowed to document what’s happening in a public space.
DHS says filming, posting videos of ICE agents is “doxxing,” vows prosecutions. The core issue here seems to be about whether sharing that footage, particularly if it includes information that could identify the individuals, constitutes “doxxing.” The term itself is getting thrown around a lot, but it’s not even consistently defined in law, let alone criminalized on a federal level. So, what’s happening? The situation as it is now, if you are being arrested you can ask to see the arresting officer’s identification. It is a safeguard that anyone could follow, so that if someone is making an arrest and you are unsure, you can ensure they are who they say they are.
DHS says filming, posting videos of ICE agents is “doxxing,” vows prosecutions. Many people are pointing out the lack of transparency on the part of ICE agents. If they’re operating in public and they’re not clearly identifying themselves, doesn’t that raise questions about their authority and the legitimacy of their actions? The absence of body cameras and the use of masks seem to be fueling this perception, adding to the sense that ICE might be trying to hide something. It leads to questions about accountability.
DHS says filming, posting videos of ICE agents is “doxxing,” vows prosecutions. Think about this: if ICE agents are doing things that are above board and follow the law, why the secrecy? Why the masks? Wouldn’t it be easier and safer for everyone if they were open and transparent about their actions? It’s worth pointing out that some people have expressed that they think they are there to follow the law, but that it does not make sense.
DHS says filming, posting videos of ICE agents is “doxxing,” vows prosecutions. The argument from the authorities seems to be that the act of sharing identifying information is a form of harassment. There is the expectation that if someone is making an active effort to hide their identity, filming that person and publishing their personal info could be a violation of their privacy. But there’s a counter-argument: are ICE agents, as public servants, subject to a lower expectation of privacy, much like politicians or celebrities?
DHS says filming, posting videos of ICE agents is “doxxing,” vows prosecutions. The whole conversation around “doxxing” versus legitimate journalism and public oversight is getting muddied. In many ways, the legal arguments are on the side of those who film and share videos. As it stands today, filming in public spaces is protected by the First Amendment.
DHS says filming, posting videos of ICE agents is “doxxing,” vows prosecutions. A lot of people are viewing this as another attempt to stifle dissent and make it harder to hold government agencies accountable. If people are afraid to film ICE agents, then it becomes a lot easier for those agents to operate without any sort of public scrutiny. To many, this feels like a way to create an environment where they feel emboldened to break the law.
DHS says filming, posting videos of ICE agents is “doxxing,” vows prosecutions. There’s a strong feeling that this is a case of “do as I say, not as I do.” Some people are quick to point out the irony, especially when considering how certain groups have used doxxing to target individuals they disagree with.
DHS says filming, posting videos of ICE agents is “doxxing,” vows prosecutions. At the end of the day, it really comes down to the balance between public safety, individual privacy, and government transparency. It’s a tricky balancing act, and the conversation around filming ICE agents highlights just how complex these issues can be.