Cuban Minister Condemns U.S. Caribbean Strikes as “Assassinations”

Following the U.S. military actions in the Caribbean, Latin American leaders, including those from Colombia and Cuba, condemned the United States for its unilateral attacks on boats in the region, particularly those off the coast of Venezuela. These leaders have expressed concern over the extrajudicial killings of civilians and the potential for destabilization. Cuba’s Deputy Foreign Minister Carlos Fernández de Cossío emphasized the unjustified nature of the military presence and called for a responsible attitude from the United States. Furthermore, the article also touched upon the false claims made by former U.S. President Donald Trump about Cuba’s access to medicine and autism rates.

Read the original article here

They’re Assassinating People for No Reason, according to Cuban Minister Carlos Fernández de Cossío, who’s speaking out about U.S. strikes in the Caribbean. The core of the issue seems to be the recent actions by the U.S. military, particularly the bombings of alleged Venezuelan “drug boats” at sea. The minister’s condemnation centers around the fact that these strikes have resulted in the deaths of at least 17 people, without providing any clear evidence of drug trafficking or links to the Venezuelan government. This lack of transparency and due process is at the heart of the outrage.

The U.S. military presence in the Caribbean is a major point of contention, with the Cuban minister asserting that it serves no legitimate purpose. He explicitly states that the justification of fighting drugs or organized crime is simply not believable. The core of the criticism is that it amounts to extrajudicial killings, or as the minister puts it, “assassinating people for no reason.” This perspective highlights a deep concern regarding the legality and morality of these actions, especially given the lack of verifiable evidence presented to justify the killings.

The arguments about the U.S. actions clearly spark deep frustration, and there are several viewpoints about the consequences of this behavior. One point is that the actions are a demonstration of excessive force used to scare everyone and show that you will accept no pushback. There is also discussion that it leads to a climate of fear, where individuals are vulnerable to potentially deadly actions without any real accountability. The concerns range from the potential erosion of legal standards to the chilling effect these actions have on the region.

It’s not just the direct actions that are being criticized; the broader context is also under scrutiny. Some people note that the timing of these events is connected to heightened pressure on Venezuela. The U.S. has increased its military presence in the area and placed a significant bounty on President Nicolás Maduro, further escalating tensions. This suggests that the actions are not isolated incidents but are part of a larger political strategy.

The conversation goes into the definition of assassination, pointing out that it’s a willful killing, often carried out secretly, especially targeting prominent or important figures. The implication here is that the attacks in the Caribbean fit this definition because they are politically motivated and deliberately carried out, suggesting a dangerous trend of using violence for political ends. In this case, the lack of a credible justification only reinforces the concern that these actions are being carried out for reasons that are not in the public interest.

The comments also touch on how the rest of the world views the United States, with a suggestion that the country has become a source of ridicule on the global stage. The lack of respect for the rule of law, coupled with a perceived disregard for human life, contributes to this negative perception. This paints a picture of a nation whose actions are increasingly out of step with international norms and values.

There is a lot of discussion, and people’s individual experiences. Some commenters draw a connection between these actions and the country’s history, claiming violence. These commenters also feel that many Americans are not, in general, violent people.

Ultimately, the core issue is the extrajudicial killings. Regardless of the targets, the manner of their deaths without due process is a serious problem. The lack of accountability and transparency breeds a climate of fear and mistrust, leading to a serious question of where this behavior will lead.