By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Fuel shortages are emerging in occupied Crimea and Russia’s Zabaykalsky Krai, with A-95 petrol being restricted to businesses and organizations using special fuel cards. Residents report the disappearance of petrol from many filling stations and inflated prices, even with official retail price controls in place. These restrictions began in early August, coinciding with Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian oil refineries, which have disrupted operations and reduced fuel supply. Despite government efforts to curb prices, including an export ban, petrol prices continue to rise, reaching historic highs on the St. Petersburg International Mercantile Exchange and impacting domestic availability.
Read the original article here
Fuel shortages in parts of Russia following drone strikes on refineries, it seems, are a direct consequence of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. It’s a simple equation, really: attacks on crucial infrastructure, like oil refineries, disrupt the supply chain. Without those refineries working at full capacity, there’s less fuel to go around. And when the military needs fuel to function, guess who gets priority? Unfortunately, it’s often the civilian population that ends up feeling the pinch. You can already imagine the impact on daily life, from increased prices at the pump to potential disruptions in transportation and general economic activity.
The core of the issue lies in Russia’s reduced capacity to process its own oil. It has the raw resources, the oil itself, but the refineries are the factories that transform it into usable products like gasoline and diesel. And these processing facilities, as they’re being targeted, aren’t operating as they should. This is a major vulnerability that Ukraine seems to be exploiting. It’s a strategic move, one that directly impacts Russia’s ability to wage war and its citizens’ quality of life. While some might argue that hardship won’t sway the general populace, it does create a significant and immediate inconvenience. It’s like a pressure cooker; small annoyances can lead to widespread discontent if they’re not addressed.
The question of who is going to pay to rebuild Russia’s infrastructure this time is a complex one. The history of the relationship between the West and Russia suggests it may not be the same as before. Remember the 90s, when the West poured money into Russia’s oil industry, helping to build up its refining and pipeline capacity? Those days might be over. China, however, seems like a likely contender. They have a vested interest in accessing Russia’s energy resources, particularly to reduce their dependence on sea-based shipping, which they perceive as a potential vulnerability. However, China is also investing heavily in domestic energy sources and will be seeking a long-term energy strategy. So the terms of any agreements might be different this time around.
The general sentiment seems to be a mixture of schadenfreude and a sense of inevitability. Seeing a nation experience consequences for its actions is, in a way, satisfying. Many people believe the hardship will likely be blamed on others, likely Ukraine, instead of acknowledging that the root cause is their government’s decisions. This perspective reflects a deeper understanding of the political climate and the historical patterns of denial that can be found in Russia. From personal experiences, those from Russia have seen worse; things may eventually improve, but it will take time.
It’s easy to forget the broader context, but the scale of this conflict, and the fact that the Western world is financially supporting both the war effort and potentially rebuilding efforts, is staggering. This adds another layer of complexity to the whole situation. Then there’s the question of the average Russian’s reaction. It is hard to get an accurate picture of the public mood. The average Russian is likely older and less connected to Western social media. Most average Russians are likely to be less aware of the nuances of the conflict and more focused on daily survival.
The current fuel shortages highlight a critical weakness in Russia’s ability to sustain its war efforts. It’s not just about the military; it’s about the impact on civilian life. If the disruption continues, it will likely have significant economic and social consequences. It will be interesting to see how this situation evolves and how it affects the long-term trajectory of the war and Russia’s place in the world.