In response to a Supreme Court decision, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released a memo outlining plans to revoke citizenship from children born to immigrants, including those with temporary legal status. The memo envisions federal review of parents’ documentation, potentially in hospitals, to determine a newborn’s citizenship status. The plan would deny citizenship to children of immigrants who are “unlawfully present,” potentially rendering them deportable, and also includes children of those with lawful but temporary presence, such as visa holders and Dreamers. This policy change would necessitate intrusive federal involvement and create a caste-based system, putting ICE agents in maternity wards and potentially deporting babies.

Read the original article here

The announcement of Trump’s plan to revoke birthright citizenship has sent shockwaves, and honestly, it’s even more terrifying than initially anticipated. We’re not just talking about a simple policy change; we’re looking at a potential dismantling of a fundamental constitutional right, and the implications are truly chilling.

The core of the plan, as described in the released memo, is a comprehensive effort to strip citizenship from children born to immigrants lacking permanent legal status, and even some lawful residents. The sheer scope of this is breathtaking. Imagine an America where a significant portion of the population born within its borders are suddenly deemed non-citizens, vulnerable to detention and deportation. It’s a stark departure from the principles upon which this nation was founded.

One of the most disturbing aspects is the proposed method of implementation. The plan envisions invasive federal review of parents’ documentation, potentially in hospitals, before or immediately after birth. Picture this: immigration officials scrutinizing medical records, questioning parents, and determining a newborn’s citizenship status before the baby even leaves the hospital. This creates an environment of fear and suspicion, turning hospitals—places of healing and new life—into potential checkpoints for immigration enforcement.

What’s even more alarming is the potential for immediate action. According to the memo, there’s no indication of a grace period. These children, from the moment they are born, could be subject to arrest and deportation, alongside their parents. This is not just about changing laws; it’s about uprooting families and tearing apart communities. The memo itself admits there’s a court injunction preventing this action, but then declares that the implementing agency, USCIS, is “preparing to implement the E.O. in the event that it is permitted to go into effect.” This is not just a policy, it’s a weaponized legal strategy designed to circumvent established law.

The motivation behind this isn’t hard to decipher, and it goes beyond mere immigration control. This is about power. The goal is to create an underclass of people, with their lives permanently altered and restricted. This plan uses the guise of constitutional interpretation to enact an unconstitutional mandate. It’s worth noting that key figures behind this plan are not just Trump, but advisors like Stephen Miller, Russel Vought, and Peter Thiel, who are clearly driving this agenda.

The legal challenges to this plan will be immense, and thankfully, there are existing legal precedents, like *United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898)*, that support birthright citizenship. However, the Supreme Court’s current composition is worrying. If the court, already criticized for its decisions, were to uphold this plan, it could fundamentally alter the definition of who is an American. The stakes could not be higher.

The potential consequences are extensive. We could see the rise of home births, as parents seek to avoid the intrusive reach of immigration enforcement. Midwifery could experience a revival, and tragically, there’s a likelihood of increased infant and mother mortality rates as a result. We could also see the erosion of trust in public institutions, and a further polarization of society.

This plan is not a mere policy proposal; it is a direct attack on the Constitution. It’s a blatant attempt to seize power, to control people, and to rewrite the rules of American citizenship. The notion that this is somehow worse than imagined isn’t a statement of disbelief; it’s a grim acknowledgement of the depth of this administration’s cynicism and cruelty.

This plan also highlights the importance of our civic duty. It is an outright attempt at overreach by the executive branch and must be met with fierce resistance, both in the streets and at the ballot box. This is not a debate, and the very idea is wrong.