By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a historic move, a North Korean defector is set to file both civil and criminal lawsuits in South Korea against Kim Jong-un and other officials for crimes against humanity. The Center for Human Rights Legal Support will submit these complaints on behalf of Choi Min-kyeong, who alleges she endured severe abuse in a North Korean detention facility. The lawsuits are also meant to bring attention to human rights issues in North Korea, with plans to potentially extend the case to international bodies like the UN and the International Criminal Court. This marks the first time a North Korean-born victim of human rights violations has brought such a case.
Read the original article here
North Korean defector sues Kim Jong-un in historic first, a development that immediately sparked my curiosity. It’s hard to ignore a story as dramatic as this one, especially when it involves a legal battle against a leader as enigmatic and powerful as Kim Jong-un. The very idea of a defector taking such a step is almost unbelievable, a testament to the individual’s courage and perhaps desperation.
The practical implications of this lawsuit are, well, complicated. The immediate question is: how does one even *do* this? North Korea is notoriously isolated and resistant to international law. The court might issue a ruling, certainly, but enforcing it is a completely different beast. It’s like the defector has thrown down a gauntlet, knowing full well it’s unlikely to be picked up in a conventional way.
I can’t help but consider the sheer boldness of the move, this David versus Goliath scenario. The defector is essentially challenging a regime known for its brutality and complete disregard for human rights. There is the very real possibility that this act could put the defector in danger. The North Korean state isn’t exactly known for its forgiving nature toward those who speak out against them, let alone those who actively seek to hold the leader accountable. The defector has to consider the risks, the potential retaliation, and the lasting impact of this bold action.
The discussion immediately brings to mind the reality of international law. While the United States is not particularly friendly to the International Criminal Court (ICC) for its own reasons, a civil suit can be filed even if it doesn’t necessarily have the teeth to enforce a ruling. Even if the lawsuit is successful, there’s no easy way to ensure that Kim Jong-un would actually pay any judgment, and I am curious to see how the UN and ICC play into the situation.
The details start to unfold when considering practical scenarios and potential outcomes. One possibility, and perhaps the most likely, is that North Korea will simply ignore the lawsuit. They might not send any legal representatives, they may not acknowledge the court’s jurisdiction, and it’s almost certain Kim Jong-un himself wouldn’t show up. The judge could then issue a default judgment in favor of the defector, but that judgment, in itself, would mean very little.
This type of thing has happened before. The example of Otto Warmbier’s parents filing a case after their son’s tragic death immediately comes to mind. They won a default judgment against North Korea in the US, but enforcing it was a challenge. They were ultimately able to seize a North Korean merchant vessel, the Wise Honest, which was then sold for scrap to compensate for some of the damages. Even so, the sale only covered a fraction of the judgment, highlighting the difficulties of holding a rogue state accountable.
Considering the scenario, it feels as though the case would be far more symbolic than anything else. Even if the defector can secure some sort of judgment, collecting on it is a monumental hurdle. Kim Jong-un isn’t likely to be swayed by court orders from a Western democracy. The impact here might not be immediate, but it could still be significant. The case will bring renewed scrutiny to the human rights situation in North Korea and the actions of its leader, and there is always the potential to affect international relations.
The defector’s actions could open the door for similar suits from other victims of the regime, potentially accumulating further international pressure. It could also embolden other defectors to come forward, creating a larger wave of opposition. It becomes a question of whether the symbolic victory would be worth the real-world risks.
The news is also notable in that it marks the first time in history a North Korean-born victim has filed a lawsuit over human rights violations. This fact gives the case some weight. It’s a step in a process of accountability, and it signals that there are individuals who are willing to push back against the regime, no matter the consequences. The case will be a long, uphill battle, but it holds the potential to open eyes, start conversations, and maybe, just maybe, make some small impact on the deeply troubling human rights situation in North Korea.
I am, of course, following this case with an open mind, understanding that the outcome is far from certain. The defector’s courage is undeniable. This lawsuit, even if unsuccessful, serves as a powerful statement to the world, a reminder of the human cost of Kim Jong-un’s regime and a rallying cry for justice.