In a surprising turn of events, Donald Trump has sued Rupert Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal for $10 billion after the publication of a story detailing Trump’s connection with Jeffrey Epstein. While Trump attempts to intimidate Murdoch, legal experts believe his case is weak and may backfire. Despite this, Murdoch appears unwilling to back down. The Wall Street Journal stands by its reporting, even as Trump continues to praise Fox News personalities while simultaneously criticizing other Murdoch-owned outlets. This lawsuit may mark a turning point in the often-fraught relationship between Trump and Murdoch.
Read the original article here
‘I’m 94 years old and will not be intimidated’: Has Trump met his match in Rupert Murdoch? It’s a question that’s been swirling around lately, and honestly, it’s a tangled web of power, ego, and, let’s face it, a whole lot of damage. We’re talking about two titans here, both with a hand in shaping the political landscape, and now, it seems, they’re at odds. But is this a clash of ideologies, a battle for the soul of conservatism, or just a couple of old bulls butting heads?
Let’s be honest, Rupert Murdoch is not exactly the hero of this story. Many people place a great deal of blame on him for creating the very environment that allowed Trump to rise to power. His media empire, particularly Fox News, fed the machine, churning out content that fueled Trump’s rise. It’s a bit like Dr. Frankenstein, except instead of a monster, we got… well, you know. So, the idea of Murdoch suddenly turning on Trump, especially now, isn’t exactly inspiring. It’s more like the monster finally turning on the mad scientist. The narrative shifts quickly.
The crux of the matter seems to be that Trump is no longer useful to Murdoch’s long-term goals. Trump’s brand of instability is bad for business. He stirs up controversy. Tax cuts are nice, but economic uncertainty is not. The WSJ, and Murdoch by extension, needs that stability. Perhaps there is an understanding that Trump is unsustainable. This is not a crisis of conscience or a sudden revelation of morality; it’s a cold, hard calculation. And frankly, the possibility of Trump starting a nuclear war is not a good business plan either.
And it’s not just a case of a change of heart. It’s about power. Murdoch has the resources and the influence to damage his enemies. He’s been doing it for decades. He owns the media outlets. Trump can shout all he wants, but Murdoch has the power to fight back, and that’s a significant difference. Also, it’s worth noting that Murdoch doesn’t have a problem with conservative ideals, they are important to him. He just doesn’t think Trump is the future. This is where it could potentially be the beginning of the end for Trump.
However, this isn’t a simple good versus evil narrative. Both Trump and Murdoch have played their parts in creating the current political climate, and both are driven by ego. They both helped create the division that is currently present. It’s not about a white knight standing up to a bully; it’s two powerful figures vying for control, and, unfortunately, everyone else is caught in the crossfire. It’s like a mob boss demanding an underling get back in line.
Also, it looks like Murdoch might be playing both sides to make money. The WSJ publishes exposés, driving traffic, while Fox News takes whatever tack the White House wants pushed. In essence, he’s making bank off both sides. He’s hedging his bets and earning a small fortune either way. If he is stubborn and has too much energy left to fight Trump looses. If Murdoch dies and the empire goes to his children, who are mostly not in Trump’s camp Trump looses.
So, what does this mean for Trump? It could be the beginning of the end. The fact that Murdoch owns both sides of the argument is a massive problem. Murdoch, at 94, has nothing to lose. So let’s dump them both into a stadium with some office furniture for weapons and let them fight. Ultimately, it is not a fight between good and evil. It’s a fight between the masters of their own universes.
