By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Amidst mounting controversy surrounding the dismissal of the Epstein case by Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino took a day off work. Reports from Laura Loomer and later confirmed by Axios, suggest Bongino’s displeasure with Bondi’s handling of the Epstein files and a perceived lack of transparency. The disagreement stems from a DOJ memo denying the existence of an Epstein “client list” and reaffirming his suicide, contradicting long-held conspiracy theories within the MAGA base. This has led to speculation regarding Bongino’s future with the FBI, with some sources suggesting he may resign due to these issues.
Read the original article here
Federal Judge Tells LAPD to Stop Shooting at Journalists. This whole situation really boils down to something incredibly basic, doesn’t it? A federal judge essentially had to tell the Los Angeles Police Department, the LAPD, to stop shooting at journalists. It’s the kind of thing that, frankly, shouldn’t even need to be said. You’d think it would be a given that those whose job it is to uphold the law wouldn’t be actively firing on those whose job it is to report on it. But, here we are.
Federal Judge Tells LAPD to Stop Shooting at Journalists. The fact that this needed to happen in the first place is pretty damning. There’s an implicit admission here that the LAPD was, in fact, engaging in actions that directly violate the First Amendment. It suggests a pattern of behavior where journalists, who are essentially the eyes and ears of the public, were being intentionally targeted. Think about it: photojournalists being pushed over by officers and trampled by police horses, journalists being detained and arrested despite identifying themselves, officers aiming their guns and firing at reporters on live television – these are not isolated incidents. They paint a picture of a department that sees the press as an enemy, not a crucial component of a democratic society.
Federal Judge Tells LAPD to Stop Shooting at Journalists. And what’s the response? A polite request. Honestly, there’s a sentiment that’s hard to ignore: the LAPD seems to have a fundamental disregard for the role of the press. This is a deeply troubling issue, and one that goes beyond just the LAPD. It’s a reflection of a broader trend of distrust and, frankly, outright hostility towards journalists, and toward the press.
Federal Judge Tells LAPD to Stop Shooting at Journalists. We have to ask ourselves, why would the LAPD behave this way? One thought is that they want to prevent the press from reporting on their actions during protests and demonstrations. If they are following protocol, then there is no need to abuse reporters. Yet, if the actions being taken are not above board, or perhaps even illegal, then the press becomes a threat to hide the truth. It’s a tactic that’s often used by those who want to control the narrative, to silence dissent, and to operate outside the bounds of accountability.
Federal Judge Tells LAPD to Stop Shooting at Journalists. The reactions to this ruling are, understandably, filled with a mix of disbelief and frustration. The sense that this is just the latest in a long line of abuses is palpable. People are right to question the effectiveness of a judge’s order when there’s a history of the LAPD disregarding consequences for their actions. What happens if they don’t comply? A slap on the wrist? Paid time off? The feeling that there are no real consequences for their actions is common.
Federal Judge Tells LAPD to Stop Shooting at Journalists. The lack of accountability fuels this sense of injustice. Many feel that the police are often shielded from meaningful repercussions for their actions, regardless of how egregious they may be. The idea of qualified immunity, which protects officers from civil lawsuits, is brought up. Where do the Democrats come in? Shouldn’t they be taking a stronger stance? It all contributes to the feeling that the system is rigged in favor of the police.
Federal Judge Tells LAPD to Stop Shooting at Journalists. This whole situation really highlights the role of the press in a democratic society. Journalists act as a check on power, holding those in authority accountable and ensuring that the public is informed about what’s happening. When the police attack journalists, they are attacking the very foundations of our democracy, and the public’s right to the truth.
Federal Judge Tells LAPD to Stop Shooting at Journalists. But the press can only do its job if it is allowed to do so. The physical dangers involved with reporting are brought to light, the rubber bullets, the tear gas, the physical assaults. This makes for a dangerous job in the best of times, but when the police are shooting at you, it becomes a different story altogether. This isn’t the kind of thing that should be happening in a country that values the freedom of the press.
Federal Judge Tells LAPD to Stop Shooting at Journalists. The comparison to countries like Mexico or Russia, where the press faces far greater threats and restrictions, is telling. It’s a reminder that these types of abuses aren’t something that just “happen” in democracies. It is important to note, that these types of things do occur in the United States. It is a wake-up call to protect the freedoms we often take for granted.
Federal Judge Tells LAPD to Stop Shooting at Journalists. This whole situation is a reminder that we, the people, are the press. We are the ones who must hold power accountable, demand transparency, and speak out against injustice. And that begins with understanding that freedom of the press is not just a constitutional right, but a fundamental pillar of a just and free society. And what happens next? This is the critical question. Will this ruling lead to any real changes, or will it be met with a shrug and a continuation of the same old behavior? Only time will tell.