By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Two Capitol Police officers sued House Speaker Mike Johnson for failing to install a legally mandated plaque honoring officers who defended the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The lawsuit alleges that Johnson’s inaction, despite the existence of the plaque and a 2022 law with a one-year deadline, is a deliberate attempt to rewrite history and minimize the events of that day. This refusal contrasts sharply with the numerous honors bestowed upon former President Trump by some Republicans. The officers’ attorney argues this omission encourages a false narrative of the January 6th attack and disrespects the officers’ sacrifice. A Democratic Representative is publicly supporting the officers by displaying the plaque design.
Read the original article here
Two Capitol Police officers have filed a federal lawsuit, alleging a blatant disregard for a law mandating the installation of an honorary plaque commemorating their colleagues’ bravery during the January 6th insurrection. The lawsuit directly targets House Speaker Mike Johnson and his refusal to comply with the 2022 law, which set a deadline of one year for the plaque’s placement on the Capitol’s west front—the site of some of the day’s most intense violence.
This legal action highlights a deeply troubling disregard for the sacrifices made by these officers. The law was clearly intended to honor their courage and dedication in defending the Capitol building and the democratic process itself, yet this simple act of recognition has been deliberately blocked. The failure to install the plaque feels like a deliberate attempt to minimize the gravity of the January 6th events and the heroism displayed by the officers who faced down the mob.
The lack of action speaks volumes. It’s more than just a bureaucratic oversight; it’s a symbolic rejection of the officers’ service and a tacit endorsement of the insurrectionists’ actions. The refusal to honor these individuals stands in stark contrast to the widespread public condemnation of the violence that occurred on that day.
The lawsuit underscores a larger issue of political polarization and the apparent erosion of respect for the rule of law. A bipartisan law, passed to acknowledge the valor of Capitol Police officers, has been effectively nullified by the actions, or rather inaction, of one party. This disregard for a law passed with clear purpose raises serious questions about the current political climate and the willingness of some to uphold democratic norms.
The officers’ decision to pursue legal action demonstrates their commitment to obtaining the recognition they deserve. This isn’t just about a plaque; it’s about acknowledging the profound impact of January 6th and the critical role played by those who defended the Capitol. The lawsuit presents a powerful statement, demanding that the sacrifices made that day be properly acknowledged and respected.
The controversy surrounding the plaque also reveals a broader pattern of political maneuvering and selective memory. Many find it deeply ironic, if not outright appalling, that those who claim to support law enforcement are actively preventing the recognition of officers who risked their lives to uphold the law. This apparent hypocrisy fuels public frustration and cynicism, further eroding trust in government institutions.
The ongoing debate surrounding this issue also highlights a wider societal conversation about the legacy of January 6th. For many, the refusal to install the plaque represents an attempt to rewrite history, downplaying the severity of the insurrection and the threats it posed to American democracy. This deliberate act of omission, many believe, serves to undermine the principles of accountability and justice that are vital to the proper functioning of a democratic society.
The lawsuit filed by the Capitol Police officers, therefore, transcends the seemingly minor issue of a commemorative plaque. It has become a symbol of a larger struggle, representing the ongoing battle for the preservation of democratic values and the recognition of those who risked their lives to defend them. The outcome of this lawsuit will not only have implications for the officers involved, but it will also hold profound symbolic weight for the future of American politics and the memory of this pivotal historical event.
The refusal to install the plaque isn’t just an oversight; it’s a deliberate act that sends a chilling message, not just to the officers involved but to everyone who values the rule of law and the principles of democracy. The lawsuit is a crucial step in ensuring that the sacrifices of these officers are properly recognized and that accountability is demanded for this blatant disregard of a clearly stated law. The outcome will likely have far-reaching consequences, shaping future narratives surrounding January 6th and the ongoing struggle to preserve the integrity of American democracy.