By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A recent US intelligence assessment reveals Vladimir Putin’s unwavering commitment to victory in Ukraine, pursuing a strategy of attrition to weaken Ukrainian resistance and Western support. Despite slow progress and substantial Russian losses—exceeding 700,000 soldiers and 10,000 pieces of equipment—Moscow’s military command deems this approach acceptable. Russia’s offensive, aided by North Korean troops and sustained attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure, aims to achieve Ukrainian neutrality and further partition of the country. This strategy, while costly, is predicated on outlasting Ukraine and its Western allies.
Read the original article here
Putin remains resolute in his pursuit of victory in Ukraine, a conclusion supported by US assessments. This unwavering determination stems from the fact that anything short of complete conquest would be perceived as a debilitating admission of weakness on the global stage. It’s a high-stakes gamble, one that necessitates a complete victory to maintain his power and image.
This unwavering stance is not a surprise to many. The initial ceasefire proposed by Putin was broken almost immediately, a clear indication of his true intentions. Claims by others that the conflict could be quickly resolved through negotiation or other means seem vastly naive given the demonstrated reality of Putin’s commitment. The belief that any leader, particularly one known for his ruthlessness, would easily abandon a long-held, deeply invested strategic objective, ignores the fundamental power dynamics at play.
The conflict’s duration is another factor fueling Putin’s resolve. His belief that he can outlast Western support mirrors Russia’s lengthy involvement in Afghanistan. However, this comparison overlooks significant differences. The current conflict is far closer to Russia’s borders, impacting the country more directly and intensifying the stakes involved. The assumption that Western support will falter before Putin achieves his objectives seems overly optimistic given the current levels of international aid to Ukraine.
Putin’s confidence is further bolstered by internal factors. He surrounds himself with advisors who likely echo his beliefs, creating an echo chamber that reinforces his perception of reality. This distorted reality makes it exceptionally difficult for any dissenting voices, even potentially those within his inner circle, to effectively challenge his strategies. The information he receives is likely heavily filtered and carefully curated to avoid presenting any conflicting narratives that might undermine his confidence.
The ongoing war is also proving to be significantly costly for Russia. The depletion of resources and the loss of lives, coupled with the resulting generation-long demographic impact, are consequences that might deter a more rational leader. Yet, it appears Putin remains impervious to these significant losses and focuses primarily on his ultimate aim of conquering Ukraine. Any other outcome, in his distorted reality, is unacceptable.
There’s a sense of a broader game at play. Some believe Putin’s objectives extend beyond Ukraine, encompassing plans for Moldova and potentially exploiting vulnerabilities within the Baltic states and NATO. This broader perspective emphasizes the strategic importance of this conflict for him, further underscoring his commitment to victory.
The US assessments reflect a sobering reality. They highlight the challenges of confronting an adversary whose resolve is unwavering, whose perception of reality is fundamentally skewed, and whose ultimate aims may stretch far beyond the current battlefield. The international community faces a complex situation, requiring a sustained and coordinated response to counter Putin’s ambitions, a response that necessitates clear-headedness and a long-term strategic approach in the face of potentially protracted conflict. The implications of a sustained conflict and a failure to counter this are significant, and require a strategy that is well-informed and effectively implemented. The ultimate cost of failing to counter Putin’s objectives and his relentless pursuit of victory is likely too high for the world to contemplate.