By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A drone strike on Russia’s Shaikovka airbase on March 31, 2025, significantly damaged infrastructure crucial for Kh-22 and Kh-32 missile operations. Satellite imagery reveals the destruction of missile storage facilities and a technical building used for missile preparation and fueling. Despite Russian claims of intercepting all drones, the attack rendered stationary fueling stations unusable and caused substantial damage to a depot near aircraft parking. The strike targeted the 52nd Heavy Bomber Aviation Regiment, known for using these missiles against Ukraine.
Read the original article here
Drone strikes targeting Russia’s Shaikovka airbase on the night of March 31, 2025, have reportedly caused significant damage to a crucial part of its military infrastructure. Satellite imagery, released by the Ukrainian OSINT team CyberBoroshno, provides compelling visual evidence of the attack’s devastating impact. The images clearly show the destruction of a missile storage facility and a technical building used to maintain and prepare Kh-22 and Kh-32 missiles, key components in Russia’s long-range strike capabilities.
The airbase, home to the Tu-22M3 strategic bombers responsible for deploying these missiles, suffered substantial damage to its support facilities. Specifically, a building dedicated to preparing these missiles for launch, involving critical tasks like fueling and configuration, sustained severe damage. The satellite images highlight the complete absence of the stationary fueling stations previously present at the site, strongly suggesting their destruction during the strike.
Further analysis of the satellite photos reveals the destruction of storage facilities specifically designed to house the supersonic Kh-22/32 missiles. At least one heavily damaged depot, situated near an aircraft parking area, is clearly visible in the imagery. The images also reveal an area where the exact nature of the damage is unclear; it could be aircraft wreckage or the remnants of another building, highlighting the wide-ranging nature of the destruction.
The official Russian account of the incident stands in stark contrast to the evidence presented by the satellite images. While local authorities reported intercepting all 24 drones launched at the base, they failed to account for the reported explosions heard at the facility. This discrepancy between the official statement and the visible destruction suggests a significant discrepancy in the narrative surrounding the event. The claim of successfully intercepting all drones, while ignoring the extensive damage, seems at odds with the physical evidence.
The successful targeting of the missile stockpile and preparation facilities at Shaikovka has serious implications for Russia’s military operations in Ukraine. The Kh-22/32 missiles, known for their devastating power, have been used extensively in attacks on Ukrainian targets. Damaging these facilities not only limits Russia’s capacity to launch these missiles but also disrupts its logistical chain, affecting its ability to maintain and deploy this crucial element of its arsenal.
The attack on Shaikovka underscores the ongoing vulnerability of even heavily defended Russian military installations to modern warfare tactics. The apparent success of the drone strike raises significant questions about the effectiveness of Russia’s air defense systems and highlights the potential of asymmetric warfare to inflict significant damage on a technologically superior adversary. The absence of stationary fueling stations, a key element in the operational readiness of these missiles, further indicates a considerable setback for Russia’s offensive capabilities.
The visual evidence provided by the satellite imagery leaves little doubt about the effectiveness of the drone strike. While the exact extent of damage and the long-term consequences remain to be fully assessed, the destruction of a significant portion of Kh-22/32 missile infrastructure at Shaikovka undeniably represents a severe blow to Russia’s military capacity. The incident highlights the evolving dynamics of modern conflict, where precision strikes using relatively low-cost assets can significantly impact a technologically advanced military’s operational readiness. The aftermath at Shaikovka offers a potent visual demonstration of this evolving reality.
The impact extends beyond the immediate military consequences. The event serves as a strong reminder of the vulnerability of even the most sophisticated military assets in the face of determined and well-executed attacks. The implications for future military strategies and defense planning are significant, suggesting a potential shift in emphasis toward robust defensive measures and counter-drone technologies. Furthermore, the successful strike could embolden similar actions against other strategic Russian military targets.