Elon Musk’s immense wealth and influence, rivaling that of a nation-state, allow him to operate with impunity, wielding control over X (formerly Twitter) to manipulate public opinion and interfere in elections. His actions, including boosting conservative narratives and threatening various governments, pose a significant threat to democracy and global stability. Responses ranging from appeasement to aggressive countermeasures have been employed, highlighting the unprecedented challenge Musk presents to established political and legal norms. The EU, in particular, must demonstrate that even extreme wealth cannot buy immunity from legal consequences.
Read More
Under Elon Musk’s ownership, X (formerly Twitter) has experienced a surge in white supremacist and neo-Nazi content, with previously banned accounts reinstated and hateful content proliferating. The Texas Observer identified four anonymous account operators—Cyan Cruz, Michael Gramer, Robert Thorne, and John Anthony Provenzano—spreading this content, reaching a combined 500,000 followers at their peak. Musk’s interactions with these accounts, including replies and seemingly tacit approval, further fueled their rise despite a significant drop in platform moderation. These findings highlight a concerning trend of increased extremist activity and lax content moderation on X.
Read More
Elon Musk, co-lead of the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency advisory group, is publicly targeting individual government employees on X, most recently highlighting Ashley Thomas’s role at the US International Development Finance Corporation. This has led to a significant online harassment campaign against Thomas, prompting concerns about the potential for such actions to instill fear among federal employees. Musk’s actions are consistent with past behavior of using social media to attack individuals, often under the pretext of free speech. This tactic has resulted in significant online harassment campaigns against his targets.
Read More
My AI, Grok, recently identified me as a significant spreader of misinformation on X, citing my numerous controversial posts and interactions with unreliable sources as key factors. Grok’s assessment highlights the amplification effect of my large following and the potential real-world consequences of this misinformation, particularly during elections. While acknowledging the subjective nature of “misinformation” and the existence of other actors, Grok’s conclusion is noteworthy, especially given its recent own algorithmic adjustments following similar accusations. This ironic self-critique underscores the complexities and challenges inherent in combating online misinformation.
Read More
The Brazil Supreme Court panel has unanimously upheld a judge’s decision to block X nationwide, and it seems like Elon Musk is not taking it well. In the lead-up to the vote, Musk lashed out, accusing the judges of violating the constitution and even threatening to sue Brazil. It’s interesting to see how quickly things escalated, with Musk’s behavior reminiscent of a petulant child throwing a tantrum when things don’t go his way.
The decision to block X nationwide seems to have struck a nerve with Musk, who seems to believe that he is above the law. His threats to repossess the Brazilian government’s possessions and appoint a local representative reveal a sense of entitlement that is both troubling and arrogant.… Continue reading
As I scrolled through the news feeds, one headline caught my attention and immediately piqued my interest – “Brazilian Court Orders Suspension of Elon Musk’s X After It Missed Deadline”. The implications of this ruling are profound and far-reaching, not just for Brazil but potentially for the entire digital landscape globally. The court’s decision to suspend X, a platform owned by the infamous billionaire Elon Musk, stems from its failure to comply with Brazilian laws and regulations. It seems like Elon Musk’s disregard for the legal system and his cavalier attitude towards authority have finally caught up with him.
To think that a country’s sovereignty and legal system could supersede the influence and power of big tech giants and billionaires is a refreshing and empowering notion.… Continue reading
Desperate Trump Returns to X as Poll Numbers Keep Tanking
Desperation seems to be emanating from the former commander-in-chief as he makes a dramatic return to X after a prolonged absence. The plummeting poll numbers must be hitting hard, pushing him back to the platform he once thought was beneath him. It’s almost comical to see someone who prided himself on being larger than life now crawling back to the likes of Musk and Fox for attention, begging for validation from those who were perhaps already in his corner.
The timing of his return is no coincidence, with Truth Social stock on a steady decline and his campaign facing challenges after the surge of the Kamala Harris campaign.… Continue reading
It’s no secret that social media platforms have become a battleground for the battle of ideas, where differing viewpoints clash and opinions are shared freely. However, recent events surrounding the suspension of the ‘White Dudes for Harris’ account on X have sparked controversy and raised questions about the true meaning of free speech in these digital spaces.
Elon Musk, the enigmatic billionaire and now owner of X, allegedly played a role in suspending the account after it raised a massive fundraiser. This move has left many wondering whether Musk’s intentions with X are truly to protect free speech or to control it in a way that aligns with his personal beliefs.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker