Ofcom has launched an investigation into X following reports of altered images generated by Grok, which could result in significant fines or even a UK-wide ban if the platform is found in violation of the law. The UK government has also announced it will enforce the Data (Use and Access) Act this week, making the creation or requesting of deepfakes a criminal offense, along with prioritizing the issue within the Online Safety Act. Kendall, addressing the House, stated that the content on X is illegal, emphasizing that creating or sharing intimate images without consent is a criminal offense under the Online Safety Act for individuals and platforms. She urged the regulator to act swiftly.
Read More
In a recent turn of events, Elon Musk expressed strong criticism of the European Union, advocating for its abolishment following a $140 million fine imposed on his social media platform, X. The penalty was issued due to alleged violations of the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), specifically regarding transparency requirements related to blue checkmarks, advertising databases, and data access for researchers. The DSA, designed to hold online platforms accountable for content moderation and user safety, has been a point of contention, with Musk’s remarks highlighting the growing tension between X and European regulators. The EU has previously warned X about its failure to combat dangerous content, leading to concerns about the platform’s compliance with the DSA’s provisions.
Read More
Following a Turkish court order, X has blocked access to İstanbul’s suspended mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu’s Turkish-language account, citing a legal demand. This action, unprecedented for a high-profile elected official, comes amidst widespread protests following İmamoğlu’s arrest on corruption charges—charges the CHP alleges are politically motivated. The blocking follows a pattern of similar restrictions on activists and journalists’ accounts, although X previously stated its intent to challenge such orders legally. İmamoğlu’s English account remains accessible, and he continues to communicate via his lawyers.
Read More
This investigation reveals that James Joseph Rodden, an assistant chief counsel for ICE in Dallas, is the operator of the X account “GlomarResponder.” This account has a long history of posting racist, xenophobic, and pro-fascist content, including statements that endorse violence against immigrants. The identification of Rodden as GlomarResponder is supported by extensive evidence, including biographical details, employment history, and social media activity. Rodden’s continued employment with ICE raises serious ethical concerns, given his publicly expressed views and potential for bias in immigration court proceedings.
Read More
The Social Security Administration (SSA) is restructuring, reassigning 700 employees from headquarters and regional offices to field offices to avoid layoffs. This restructuring will drastically reduce regional office staff and centralize communications, relying primarily on X (formerly Twitter) for public updates instead of press releases. Simultaneously, SSA reversed prior plans to limit phone support for beneficiaries, opting instead to implement a new anti-fraud algorithm for telephone claims. These changes aim to improve efficiency and address public service needs, but concerns remain regarding potential disruptions and the impact on expertise.
Read More
Senator Warren criticized the Trump administration’s decision to make X the sole communication platform for the Social Security Administration (SSA), citing concerns about accessibility for older beneficiaries. This shift coincides with a reported 90% reduction in regional office staff and 7,000 job cuts within the SSA. While the White House denies service impacts, internal SSA communications suggest the restructuring will hinder fraud prevention efforts. The change replaces traditional communication methods like press releases with X-exclusive updates.
Read More
Following recent Turkish protests, the government has aggressively censored social media, issuing numerous takedown orders and fining companies like Meta for non-compliance. Elon Musk’s X platform has been subject to these orders, suspending hundreds of accounts including that of prominent journalist Can Dündar. While X has challenged some government orders in Turkey’s Constitutional Court, its response to the current wave of censorship contrasts sharply with Musk’s past outspoken criticism of European political figures and policies. The company has not publicly clarified the extent of its ongoing legal challenges to Turkish government censorship.
Read More
Elon Musk’s platform X, formerly known as Twitter, is facing a potential fine exceeding $1 billion from European Union regulators. This significant penalty stems from alleged violations of the Digital Services Act (DSA), a crucial piece of legislation designed to combat the spread of illicit content and disinformation on online platforms. The DSA mandates stricter monitoring of content by social media companies, a requirement X allegedly failed to meet.
The looming fine, expected to be announced this summer, represents a significant escalation of tensions between the EU and the United States. It’s not just the financial penalty that’s noteworthy; the EU is also reportedly demanding substantial changes to X’s product and operations to bring it into compliance with the DSA.… Continue reading
Following the detention of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu and the revocation of his university degree, X, at the Turkish government’s request, blocked access to student group accounts from prominent Turkish universities. These universities included Galatasaray, Middle East Technical, and Boğaziçi, and the blockages followed widespread student protests condemning the actions as politically motivated. The actions are part of a broader pattern of X complying with Turkish requests to censor dissenting voices, raising concerns about censorship under Elon Musk’s ownership. Student groups continue to protest, vowing to resist government pressure.
Read More
Elon Musk’s repeated use of a derogatory term for people with intellectual disabilities on X has drawn sharp criticism from disability advocates. This slur, while declining in usage, remains deeply offensive and reinforces harmful ableist attitudes, according to advocates who highlight the already marginalized status of the disability community. Musk’s actions, coupled with a perceived societal shift away from inclusivity, are seen as undermining the progress made in disability rights. Advocates implore Musk to cease using such language, emphasizing the importance of respectful discourse and the continued fight for disability rights and dignity.
Read More