Analysis of three X users—Anastasia Maria Loupis, Laura Loomer, and Owen Shroyer—who experienced significant drops in reach after criticizing Elon Musk reveals a potential pattern of suppression. Their decreased visibility followed public disagreements with Musk, coinciding with Musk’s statements about limiting the reach of users who block others and his actions regarding X Premium access. While X denies content suppression based on opinion, the lack of transparency in X’s algorithms and Musk’s control over the platform raise concerns about free speech on the site. These incidents, along with Musk’s past actions, suggest a potential abuse of power, contradicting his claims of creating a free speech haven.
Read More
Despite a four-day government ban on gatherings, opposition protests continue, largely centered around universities. Many associated accounts on X have been suspended, primarily those sharing protest information and locations. These suspensions, affecting primarily grassroots activists, appear to be legally sanctioned under Turkey’s 2022 social media law granting broad content suppression powers. Authorities claim to have identified hundreds of accounts inciting hatred, leading to arrests.
Read More
Following their initial suspension for reporting on the identity of Adrian Dittmann, X researchers Ryan Fae and maia arson crimew were instructed to delete further posts mentioning Dittmann. This second wave of deletions targeted posts with minimal or no direct reference to Dittmann, including those simply referencing the original article revealing his identity. Crimew, after deleting the flagged posts, had their account reinstated, while Fae and Jacqueline Sweet, the journalist who initially broke the story, remain suspended and have refused to comply with X’s demands. This inconsistent application of X’s policies has sparked criticism regarding censorship and the platform’s commitment to free speech.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker