Food stamps are back, but millions will soon lose benefits permanently, and this is happening at a particularly bad time for many families. The new law brings back stricter work requirements for parents and older Americans, a move that’s raising serious concerns. It’s hard not to feel a sense of dread when you think about children going hungry because of policies, especially when there aren’t enough jobs to go around. It’s hard not to think that this is simply the politicians’ way of trying to look populist without really considering how people will manage.
It’s clear that the impact of these changes will be deeply felt, especially by those already struggling.… Continue reading
A class-action lawsuit has been filed by New Yorkers receiving food stamps against the Trump administration in response to new work requirements taking effect soon. The plaintiffs allege the changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) were implemented too quickly and will result in thousands losing monthly food aid. The lawsuit specifically challenges the USDA’s rescinding of state and local waivers, which previously exempted recipients from work requirements. The suit is concerned about the impact on recipients who rely on the benefits, which provide a critical lifeline for many in the city.
Read More
Despite claims by administration officials that the proposed House budget contains no Medicaid cuts and that no one will lose coverage, the Congressional Budget Office projects a $723 billion reduction in federal Medicaid spending by 2034, resulting in 7.6 million people losing coverage. This is largely attributed to new work requirements for adults aged 18-64 and stricter eligibility checks. Experts warn that these measures will create barriers to enrollment and lead to coverage loss among eligible individuals. These losses contradict assurances from officials that the bill will “preserve and protect” the social safety net.
Read More
Johnson’s claim that 4.8 million Americans won’t lose Medicaid access “unless they choose to do so” is a statement that requires careful examination. The phrasing itself suggests a level of individual agency that might not reflect the realities of the situation. Many individuals enrolled in Medicaid face significant barriers to maintaining their coverage, and the assertion that loss of access is solely a matter of personal choice overlooks these systemic challenges.
The statement implies that individuals have a genuine option to keep their Medicaid benefits, suggesting a simple, easily navigable process. However, navigating the complexities of the Medicaid system, especially with added work requirements or bureaucratic hurdles, can be incredibly difficult for many people.… Continue reading
The House passed a bill containing significant Medicaid cuts, justified by Representative Mike Johnson as addressing fraud and promoting work among able-bodied recipients. However, analyses project millions will lose coverage, contradicting claims that the bill doesn’t cut Medicaid or SNAP. The legislation also includes substantial tax cuts for the wealthy and imposes new work requirements despite the vast majority of Medicaid recipients already working or being exempt. Opposition to the bill exists within the Senate GOP caucus, raising the possibility of its failure.
Read More
The U.S. House panel recently passed a Republican-backed plan to drastically overhaul Medicaid, a move projected to slash the program’s funding by a staggering $625 billion over the next decade. This significant reduction is accompanied by the introduction of a work requirement, a provision that has sparked considerable controversy and raised serious concerns about access to healthcare for millions of Americans.
This proposed change represents a sharp departure from previous GOP assurances that Medicaid would remain untouched. The scale of the cuts – three-quarters of the program’s budget – is particularly alarming, suggesting a profound shift in the party’s approach to social safety nets.… Continue reading
The Republican “One Big, Beautiful Bill” proposes significant changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to offset the cost of massive tax cuts. Key changes include shifting 5% of SNAP’s $100 billion annual cost to states starting in 2028, increasing work requirements to age 60, and preventing benefit increases beyond inflation. These cuts, totaling $230 billion, are central to the bill’s passage, garnering support from fiscally conservative lawmakers. Democrats strongly oppose these measures, citing the negative impact on vulnerable populations.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker