The Taliban’s newly implemented ban on Afghan women’s enrollment in nursing and midwifery programs has sparked widespread condemnation from human rights organizations. This decision, confirmed through reports from affected students and training institutes, effectively halts women’s access to crucial healthcare professions. The ban’s devastating consequences include a severe shortage of female healthcare providers, already critical given Afghanistan’s alarmingly high maternal mortality rate, and further limits women’s access to healthcare. Protests by female students have erupted, underscoring the urgent need to reverse this policy and safeguard women’s right to education and healthcare.
Read More
The Taliban’s recent ban on women training as nurses and midwives in Afghanistan represents a devastating blow to women’s access to healthcare and education. This decision, announced by the Ministry of Public Health under orders from the Taliban’s supreme leader, effectively closes off a crucial career path for Afghan women. The ban impacts both private and government-run medical training institutes, leaving countless women with no options for professional advancement in vital medical fields.
This prohibition is especially disheartening given the already limited opportunities available to women in Afghanistan. For many, pursuing medical education was considered a final avenue for professional growth, a last resort after facing restrictions in other educational and career paths.… Continue reading
Globally, women are actively resisting the rise of authoritarianism, as evidenced by their crucial roles in movements in Moldova, Poland, Hong Kong, and Georgia. However, the U.S. national security community often overlooks the significance of women’s issues, neglecting their vital contributions to national security. A Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) framework offers a valuable lens to understand how authoritarian regimes weaponize gender, highlighting the need for increased support of women’s groups, improved intelligence gathering incorporating gender perspectives, and greater participation of the U.S. national security community in WPS discussions. This approach can improve early detection and effective countermeasures against authoritarianism.
Read More
Donald Trump’s history of disrespectful and abusive behavior towards women is irrefutable, encompassing verbal assaults, alleged sexual assault, and documented instances of harassment. This behavior, ranging from demeaning comments to alleged physical attacks, reveals a profound contempt for women’s dignity and equality. His election normalized this misogyny, sending a dangerous message that such behavior is acceptable, thereby jeopardizing the safety and well-being of women and girls. The consequences of electing such a leader extend far beyond individual actions, impacting societal norms and attitudes towards women.
Read More
This page uses Google AMP technology for a faster mobile experience. Essential data is stored on your device to enable page functionality, while optional data collection allows for personalized ads outside the UK. Rejecting data collection prevents personalized ads but not all ads. Consent preferences are saved locally and can be adjusted via the “Ad Choices / Do not sell my info” link in the footer.
Read More
The 18-month war in Sudan has led to a surge in sexual violence against women, with both sides implicated. This has prompted many women to join the Sudanese Armed Forces, seeking training in self-defense and a sense of security. While the women are primarily being used for propaganda purposes and not combat, they see the training as a way to protect themselves from the widespread violence and harassment they face. This training serves as a vital coping mechanism for women seeking empowerment and a sense of safety in a nation ravaged by war and rampant sexual abuse.
Read More
Iran’s government is escalating its efforts to suppress women who resist the hijab mandate by opening a “Clinic for Quitting Hijab Removal” in Tehran. This clinic, overseen by the government body responsible for enforcing strict religious standards, aims to provide “scientific and psychological treatment” to women who choose not to wear the hijab, particularly young women. This move follows the recent arrest and forced psychiatric evaluation of a student who protested the hijab requirement by stripping to her underwear. These actions are part of a wider pattern of repression against women in Iran, including increased surveillance, morality police presence, and bans on unveiled women in public spaces. This systematic oppression of women, labelled “gender apartheid” by the UN, has been widely condemned by human rights groups and Iranian mental health professionals.
Read More
Following the historic presidential election, a surge in sexist and abusive attacks targeting women has been observed online. The use of misogynistic phrases, particularly the controversial “Your body, my choice,” has skyrocketed, reflecting a concerning trend of online harassment and the spread of misinformation. This inflammatory language has spilled over into real-world interactions, with reports of women being harassed and even physically assaulted. Experts urge parents to prioritize open conversations with their children about these issues, emphasizing the importance of accurate information and responsible online behavior in a world where social media increasingly shapes young people’s understanding of events.
Read More
The Iranian government has established a mental health clinic in Tehran specifically to “treat” women who choose not to wear the hijab. The clinic, called the “Clinic for Quitting Hijab Removal,” is part of a larger effort to suppress dissent and reinforce Islamic dress codes. The center will be overseen by the Headquarters for Enjoining the Good and Forbidding the Evil, a government body responsible for enforcing strict religious standards. This initiative is the latest in a series of measures aimed at controlling women’s appearance and silencing their voices, including surveillance, stricter morality police presence, and bans on unveiled women in public spaces.
Read More
Naoki Hyakuta, leader of the Conservative Party of Japan, sparked outrage with his radical proposals to address the country’s declining birth rate. During a podcast, he suggested policies including banning women over 18 from attending college, prohibiting marriage for women over 25, and even removing the uteruses of women over 30. While Hyakuta claims these were purely hypothetical, his co-host and senior party member Kaori Arimoto found the uterus removal suggestion too extreme, even hypothetically. After facing significant backlash, Hyakuta issued a public apology but defended himself, accusing media of taking his comments out of context. This is not the first time Hyakuta has been criticized for divisive statements, previously denying the Nanjing Massacre and opposing the LGBT Understanding Promotion Act.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood