Donald Trump has asserted he will “protect” women, but a majority of women appear unimpressed. The latest ABC News/Ipsos national poll shows the Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris enjoys a 14% lead among women over Trump, rising to 23% among women with a college degree and 34% among women under 40. The Brookings Institution suggests this owes to anger among women about the 2022 Dobbs decision. The same poll showed a 10-point swing to Harris among voters over 65 compared to 2020, some suggesting this is due to the “revenge of Boomer feminists”. Early voting tallies show women accounting for 55% of all ballots cast in battleground states such as Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.
Read More
Prominent right-wing influencers Mike Cernovich and Charlie Kirk have expressed concern over the early voting turnout among women which could negatively impact Donald Trump’s chances of victory. A Politico analysis showed a 10% gender gap in early voting, with women constituting 55% of early voters. Cernovich praised Trump’s strategy of targeting male audiences through podcast appearances but criticised the campaign’s engagement with women voters.
Read More
The recent declaration by a Taliban minister that women’s voices among one another are forbidden is a grotesque reminder of the nature of oppression that women in Afghanistan face daily. It leaves me bewildered and deeply concerned about the direction in which this regime is taking its society. How can a government, driven by fear and control, determine that the voices of women discussing their lives, seeking support, or expressing joy among each other pose such a significant threat? It is both outrageous and tragic.
The backbone of a robust society relies on open communication. Women sharing their thoughts, experiences, and ideas are vital not only for individual empowerment but for progressing as a collective community.… Continue reading
The recent allegations from Stacey Williams about Donald Trump groping her can be described as a disturbing reminder of a culture that allows powerful men to treat women as mere objects. When I read her account, I felt an immediate sense of sadness mixed with anger. The fact that this wasn’t an isolated incident, but rather part of a disturbing pattern involving not only Trump but also his known associate Jeffrey Epstein, reinforces just how entrenched this behavior is. It’s a twisted game that seems to play out repeatedly in the lives of those who have experienced it, where power dynamics are exploited, and victims are left to fend for themselves in a world that often doesn’t believe or protect them.… Continue reading
An 81-year-old woman making headlines for voting for the first time is a poignant reminder of just how complex the journey toward empowerment can be, especially for women of previous generations. I find myself reflecting on the circumstances that kept this woman from casting her ballot for so long—this deeply personal yet also societal story sheds light on the controlling dynamics that many women have faced in their relationships. What captured me most about her experience was not just her choice to vote, but the liberation that comes with it after decades of silence.
Voting is not merely an act of civic duty; it is an expression of one’s voice, one’s beliefs, and decidedly, one’s autonomy.… Continue reading
I can hardly wrap my head around the recent arguments presented by the Missouri Attorney General regarding the abortion pill and its impact on teen pregnancies. To say they’re bizarre would be an understatement. The assertion that the availability of mifepristone will somehow harm the state by lowering teen pregnancies is a perplexing dive into a kind of logic that is hard to comprehend. It’s shocking to see a political figure arguing in favor of more pregnant teens as if that’s the solution to some ill-defined crisis. What are they thinking?
The argument seems to boil down to a starkly utilitarian view of women—they’re seen as vessels for reproduction rather than individuals with agency and rights.… Continue reading
Marital rape is a term that should not even exist in our vocabulary today, yet here we are in India, where this heinous act is still not outlawed. The fact that the government argues that changing this would be ‘excessively harsh’ is not just disappointing but also downright disturbing. How can we, as a society, turn a blind eye to the suffering of countless women who are victimized within the confines of their own marriages?
It is appalling to think that in a country where arranged marriages are still prevalent, women may have no say in who they marry and are then subjected to sexual violence without any legal recourse.… Continue reading
As a woman living in the United States, recent news about the Supreme Court letting stand a decision barring emergency abortions that violate Texas state law is deeply troubling. The idea that hospitals in Texas can refuse to provide life-saving care to pregnant individuals in emergency situations goes against all notions of basic human rights and medical ethics. The fact that this decision came after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 adds another layer of devastation to an already dire situation.
The Biden administration rightfully argued that hospitals should have to perform abortions in emergency situations under federal law.… Continue reading
It absolutely baffles me to think that there are still places in the world where marital rape is not considered a crime. The recent statement from the India government claiming that criminalizing marital rape is ‘excessively harsh’ is not only shocking but also deeply concerning. Marital rape is a violation of human rights, plain and simple. The fact that India, along with countries like Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia, still allows this heinous act to go unpunished is a stark reminder of the long road ahead for gender equality and women’s rights.
The very idea that criminalizing any form of rape could be considered excessive is absurd.… Continue reading
I can’t believe the audacity of individuals who believe it is acceptable to invade a woman’s privacy to the extent of tracking their menstrual cycles. The thought of ‘states that want to set up full menstrual surveillance departments’ is not only disturbing but also a blatant violation of women’s rights. The insidious nature of this proposal speaks volumes about the individuals who support such intrusive measures.
The idea of branding it as “Period Patriots” or “Freedom Flow Watchers” is not only absurd but also incredibly demeaning. It reduces women to mere vessels whose reproductive cycles should be scrutinized and monitored by the state.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood