Maxwell prison transfer raises witness tampering concerns, House Dems say. Honestly, this whole situation is just screaming “bad news,” isn’t it? You’ve got Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted of sex trafficking, being moved around in the prison system after an interview with a Justice Department official and now, the House Democrats are understandably raising a massive red flag. It’s like something straight out of a movie, but unfortunately, it’s very real life and it feels more than a little disturbing. The first thought that pops into my mind is, “oh boy, here we go again.”
This reeks of potential manipulation, and the fact that Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee are jumping on this is completely valid.… Continue reading
In a recent development, Rep. Jasmine Crockett seeks Ghislaine Maxwell’s testimony before a House committee, preceding her meeting with the Trump Justice Department. This push comes after a House Oversight Committee subpoenaed Maxwell, setting a deposition date. Crockett, a frequent Trump critic, believes this would ensure bipartisan questioning, unlike the Justice Department’s approach. Despite these efforts, both Crockett and Rep. Robert Garcia acknowledge Maxwell’s history of dishonesty.
Read More
Demetric Deshawn Scott, facing an armed robbery trial, allegedly orchestrated a plot to frame Ramón Morales Reyes, a key witness, by forging death threats against President Trump and ICE. Scott, who confessed to writing the letters, aimed to have Reyes deported to prevent his testimony. This scheme involved enlisting his mother to mail the fabricated threats, successfully drawing the attention of ICE and resulting in Reyes’s detention. However, investigators quickly determined the threats were false, exposing Scott’s plan.
Read More
Prosecutors allege that Sean “Diddy” Combs, currently incarcerated in Manhattan, has violated prison rules by contacting potential witnesses in his sex trafficking case, using inmate phones and instructing family members to do the same. This alleged witness tampering, described as a “relentless” effort to influence testimony, prompted prosecutors to oppose his bail request, despite his lawyers citing the difficulties of preparing for trial from prison. The prosecution argues that no conditions could mitigate the substantial risk Diddy poses to the trial’s integrity. Diddy, who has pleaded not guilty, maintains his innocence.
Read More
Report: Donald Trump has allegedly spent millions in possible witness tampering, a strategy that seems to be another example of his unethical behavior. The prosecution’s first question should be, “Have you received any compensation from the defendant, one of his corporations, or someone representing him?” This question comes in light of ProPublica’s recent article, shedding light on payments made to key figures involved in Trump’s criminal cases.
According to records reviewed by ProPublica, Trump’s campaign increased monthly payments to Trump lawyer Boris Epshteyn’s company after Trump’s indictment, almost doubling the amount. Susie Wiles, a senior adviser to Trump’s 2024 campaign, also saw a significant increase in pay after being called to testify before a grand jury relating to Trump’s indictment.… Continue reading
Bombshell Report Reveals Team Trump Is Rewarding Key Trial Witnesses
Remember when former President Trump pardoned key figures who had questionable ties to Russia? It seemed like a shady move, but now a bombshell report from ProPublica has shed light on an even more disturbing pattern of behavior. Witnesses who testified in defense of Trump in various criminal cases were allegedly rewarded handsomely for their testimony. This includes massive raises, new jobs, and cushy severance packages, all conveniently timed around their testimony dates.
Barbara McQuade, a former U.S. attorney, highlighted the difficulty in proving witness tampering when it’s not explicit. However, the trend of financial benefits coinciding with favorable testimony could cast doubt on the credibility of these witnesses in Trump’s legal battles.… Continue reading
The recent revelation that Trump valet Walt Nauta was promised a presidential pardon if he lied to the FBI is a reflection of the deep corruption that can arise when a President wields unchecked power. This case highlights the dangers of granting absolute legal immunity to the President, especially when combined with the ability to pardon henchmen and witnesses at will. The prospect of a President (or even a President for life) sitting atop a vast criminal empire, manipulating the justice system to protect themselves and their associates, is truly alarming.
The idea that Nauta would only receive a pardon if Trump wins in 2024 is not only a risky gamble but also an unethical proposition.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker