Following Donald Trump’s victory in the recent election, a number of prominent billionaires, including Jeff Bezos, Mark Cuban, Elon Musk, and Satya Nadella, took to social media to congratulate the newly elected president. These high-profile individuals, representing diverse industries like technology and finance, expressed their support for Trump, with some even acknowledging his campaign’s success and the legitimacy of the election results. Notably, Bill Ackman, a hedge fund manager, went further by expressing his hope that the Democratic Party would undergo a significant transformation following Trump’s victory.
Read More
A Pennsylvania prosecutor’s attempt to halt a $1 million daily voter lottery organized by Elon Musk has moved to federal court. The state judge agreed that Musk should have attended the hearing, however, refrained from issuing immediate sanctions. Musk’s attorney argued that claims of federal election interference are involved in the proceedings and the state case was put on hold. In response, Krasner, the prosecutor who filed the suit, has filed a petition to return the case to state court. Critics of the daily lottery suggested it violated federal law which prohibits paying others to vote.
Read More
Pennsylvania Judge Angelo Foglietta has permitted Elon Musk to continue with million dollar cash giveaways in the swing states pending a decision by a federal court. Elon Musk is giving away cash prizes to registered voters who sign a petition to support the US constitution. District Attorney Lawrence Krasner filed a lawsuit against Musk, claiming he is running an illegal lottery.
Read More
Musk’s attorneys filed documents Wednesday night in the U.S. District Court in Philadelphia, a federal court, requesting the matter be moved to their jurisdiction – and out of the local Court of Common Pleas. “We will proceed to federal court and we will address the issues there, and seek to have the matter remanded back to the state court. The DA is also charged with protecting the public from interference with the integrity of elections,” Krasner said in a statement after the civil suit was announced.
Read the original article here
Read More
The recent news of the Philadelphia District Attorney suing Elon Musk and his super PAC over a $1 million sweepstakes has resonated with me on multiple levels. It is a striking example of the contrast between the powerful elite and the average citizen, a disparity that is becoming increasingly difficult to overlook in our society. As I reflect on the implications of this lawsuit, I am filled with both skepticism and a hope for accountability.
The trial date set for June 2034 feels like an eternity away, rendering the lawsuit almost a toothless gesture in the wake of Musk’s stature and resources.… Continue reading
The claim by Robert Kagan that there’s a clear quid pro quo between Jeff Bezos and Donald Trump resonates with the disillusionment many of us feel about the intersection of wealth, power, and political influence in America today. It reflects a broader narrative about how the ultra-rich play the game of politics not just to maintain their wealth but to secure even more, often at the expense of democracy and the populace they ostensibly serve.
The first thing that puzzles me about Bezos’ motivations is the relentless pursuit of more. What exactly does he gain from consolidating power or legitimizing Trump’s administration?… Continue reading
Elon Musk’s recent defiance towards the Justice Department is a striking example of how the powerful can sidestep legal boundaries with little fear of real repercussions. When he publicly told the DOJ to “go screw itself” in response to warnings about his $1 million lottery to support Donald Trump, it laid bare the uncomfortable truth about accountability for the elite. Here, we have a billionaire flaunting not just his wealth, but his apparent belief that the rules of the game don’t apply to him in the same way they do for everyday citizens.
Musk’s actions are not just a publicity stunt; they represent something much deeper and more troubling.… Continue reading
Elon Musk’s recent encounter with the Department of Justice (DOJ) serves as a stark reminder of the glaring double standards that permeate the fabric of our society. Paying people to vote, as he allegedly attempted to do, is not just unethical; it’s a crime that carries a hefty sentence. A reminder that this kind of behavior is punishable by up to five years in prison is laughable when contrasted with the reality that most of us face. If I were to engage in similar actions, I’d likely be facing charges and potential prison time instead of receiving a mere warning. It’s infuriating to witness such an obvious disconnect in how the law is enforced based on wealth and status.… Continue reading
Elon Musk once again made headlines, not for his revolutionary technologies or remarkable business achievements, but for his latest inflammatory comments that would undoubtedly cost any other CEO their job. The shocking reality is that while most leaders are held to account for their public statements, Musk operates in a vastly different sphere. His recent tweet, laden with historical insensitivity and a lack of simple decency, barely raised eyebrows from those who should be most concerned—his board and investors. It’s a grim reflection on the state of corporate oversight when the richest man in the world can wield his power with impunity.… Continue reading
I must admit, when I first heard about Elon Musk planning to give away $1 million per day to Pennsylvania voters, I was intrigued yet skeptical. It’s not every day that a billionaire decides to dip their toes into the political waters in such a direct and controversial way. While some may view this as a generous act of philanthropy, others, myself included, can’t help but see it as a blatant attempt to sway the outcome of an election.
The notion that Musk’s cash giveaway is not tied to any specific candidate makes little difference to me. It’s the perception that matters.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood