During a televised cabinet meeting, President Trump announced his administration’s intention to pursue the death penalty for anyone committing murder in Washington, D.C. This comes as the administration has deployed over 2,000 National Guard troops to the city, citing the need to combat violent crime. Trump has also suggested the possibility of deploying federal troops to other Democratic-led cities. Notably, Washington, D.C. abolished the death penalty in 1981.
Read More
An investigation reveals that the deployment of the National Guard to address homelessness in Washington, D.C., is significantly more expensive than providing affordable housing. The estimated daily cost of the military deployment, involving nearly 2,100 troops, exceeds $1.1 million. Conversely, providing affordable housing for all homeless individuals in D.C. would cost approximately $255,166, a fraction of the military expenditure. Despite the costly deployment and arrests, research suggests that providing housing actually reduces crime, while the administration simultaneously seeks to cut funding for public housing initiatives.
Read More
President Trump signed executive orders aimed at eliminating cashless bail in Washington, D.C. and other jurisdictions, with the D.C. order potentially impacting federal funding and directing the Attorney General to take action if the city does not change its policy. Another executive order seeks to find federal funds that could be suspended or terminated in jurisdictions with cashless bail policies. These actions reflect Trump’s broader efforts to exert control over the capital, a departure from previous administrations. The executive order also included an order to prosecute people who desecrate the American flag.
Read More
Donald Trump’s deployment of federal law enforcement in Washington, D.C., has been widely criticized as a political stunt, concentrating resources in low-crime areas and ignoring those in need. City officials and residents report feeling less safe, while Trump and his allies falsely claim success and accuse the city of lawlessness. The actions appear to be fueled by resentment towards the city’s diversity and cosmopolitan nature, as evidenced by the celebration of actions against ordinary residents by Trump’s supporters. Ultimately, the “crime” narrative seems to be a pretext for punishing a city for being more liberal, sophisticated, and diverse than certain segments of the population approve.
Read More
The recent deployment of federal troops in Washington, D.C., and Trump’s potential expansion to other cities, including Chicago, reflects a militarized approach to law enforcement. Despite no clear need for heavy military vehicles, as evidenced by a red-light-running incident involving an armored vehicle, the occupation has been met with significant opposition from residents who cite concerns about safety and a lack of focus on actual crime. Moreover, the administration’s actions, such as the arrest of an individual for public marijuana use, while also seemingly prioritizing aesthetic changes over effective solutions, and threats of further federal control, have raised questions about the motivations behind this approach. As such, officials in other cities, like Chicago, are already pushing back against these threats, viewing them as a power grab rather than a legitimate effort to improve safety.
Read More
Starting Sunday night, a limited number of National Guard members in Washington, D.C., will be armed, as directed by the Secretary of Defense. The Joint Task Force in D.C. stated that personnel will carry service weapons but operate under established Rules for the Use of Force. This represents an escalation in the federal intervention in the city, despite declining violent crime rates, with no specific threats necessitating armed guards reported. The decision follows President Trump’s order for a law enforcement crackdown and the earlier deployment of National Guard troops who have primarily focused on landmark protection and crowd control.
Read More
A CNN review of FBI data reveals that several cities within states deploying National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., at the behest of the Trump administration, had higher rates of violent crime and homicide than the District of Columbia itself. Governors from Ohio, Tennessee, Louisiana, Mississippi, and West Virginia are sending troops to assist with a crackdown on crime, despite the fact that cities within those states, such as Cleveland, Memphis, and Jackson, Mississippi, face more significant crime challenges. Critics, including Democratic lawmakers and criminal justice advocates, have condemned the federal takeover of D.C., questioning the priorities of states sending assistance while grappling with their own public safety issues. These critics suggest that political motivations, rather than genuine concerns for public safety, are driving these deployments.
Read More
The deployment of military forces in Washington D.C., with tasks including “community safety patrols,” and “area beautification,” could cost over $1 million per day. This follows President Trump’s efforts to federalize D.C., which involves the seizure of the city’s police force and flooding streets with federal officers. Governors from several states are sending National Guard troops to assist. Experts predict that the open-ended occupation could cost hundreds of millions of dollars, a sum that exceeds the amount needed for affordable housing for D.C.’s unhoused population.
Read More
President Trump has threatened a federal takeover of Washington, D.C., due to disagreements over the city’s crime statistics. Trump has already deployed federal troops and agents as part of a crackdown, despite a reported decrease in violent crime. This move has sparked controversy, with critics raising concerns about constitutional limits and home rule rights. The mayor of D.C. has stated that the city’s crime levels are at their lowest in 30 years and are working on improving the current issues. Legal challenges to the federal involvement are anticipated.
Read More
Following an influx of National Guard troops and federal officers, Washington D.C. has become a new front in Trump’s war on crime, leading to increased traffic checkpoints and heightened tension. Restaurant managers, like David Orozco, report feeling impacted by the crackdown with fewer customers and employees feeling uneasy due to the increased presence of law enforcement. While Trump claims the city is safer, data suggests a decline in restaurant bookings initially, despite a slight rally during “Restaurant Week,” and crime statistics are being investigated for potential manipulation. Ultimately, many restaurant employees and managers report fear and concern about the current situation.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker