Hegseth Demands Patriotic War Coverage, Ignores Patriotic Dissent
The article argues that a history of adversarial press scrutiny is crucial for uncovering truth, particularly concerning the U.S. military’s actions during wartime and adherence to the rules of engagement. It raises serious questions about Pete Hegseth’s declared contempt for these rules, and his pronouncements of giving the military “maximum authority on the battlefield,” suggesting a potential lowering of standards and a culture of haste that may have contributed to tragic outcomes like a school bombing. This disdain for rules of engagement is directly linked to Hegseth’s dismissal of the press, indicating a desire to avoid answering critical questions about his actions and their consequences.
John Q. Hosedrinker