On Wednesday, the Senate voted down a War Powers Act resolution aimed at blocking the Trump administration’s missile strikes on alleged Venezuelan drug boats. The resolution, sponsored by Senators Adam Schiff and Tim Kaine, failed by a vote of 51-48 with only two Republicans supporting the measure and Senator John Fetterman breaking ranks with his party. The vote came after the fourth confirmed boat strike, which led to at least 21 deaths, and amid rising tensions with Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and concerns about getting embroiled in another war. Democrats raised questions about the strikes and the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches, while Republicans defended the actions, with one labeling those involved as terrorists.
Read More
The Trump administration, under the direction of Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, has conducted a series of lethal strikes on alleged drug-smuggling vessels in the Caribbean, with the latest occurring off the coast of Venezuela. These strikes, the fourth such incident since early September, have been met with condemnation from critics, including legal scholars and human rights groups, who argue the attacks violate international and federal law. Despite these criticisms, the administration has continued the attacks, claiming they target “narco-terrorists” and are vital for national security, even without providing definitive proof of drug trafficking. Legal experts and members of Congress have expressed alarm, pointing to the lack of legal justification and potential for abuse of power.
Read More
House Speaker Mike Johnson asserted that the War Powers Act is unconstitutional, specifically regarding President Trump’s recent military actions in Iran. Johnson believes Trump’s actions are within his Article 2 powers and that the resolution barring U.S. military action in Iran will not pass. Though a privileged resolution introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie could force a vote, Johnson indicated it may be withdrawn due to a ceasefire, potentially preventing a conflict over the president’s authority. Trump has criticized Massie, which could influence the resolution’s fate.
Read More
President Trump’s surprise military strikes against Iran sparked immediate controversy, with Democrats questioning the legality and strategic soundness of the action and some calling for impeachment. While Republicans largely supported the President, Democrats cited the War Powers Act, demanding Congressional authorization for the military action. Accusations of misleading the nation and bypassing Congress fueled the debate, highlighting deep divisions over the strikes’ justification and potential consequences. The differing responses underscore the highly polarized political climate surrounding US foreign policy in the Middle East.
Read More
President Trump’s airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities were preceded by notification to top Republican congressional leaders, including House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune. However, key Democrats, such as the top members of the House and Senate intelligence committees, were informed only after the attacks. While Republicans largely supported the president’s actions, Democrats overwhelmingly condemned the unilateral decision, citing a lack of congressional approval and demanding briefings. This partisan divide fueled an already tense debate in Congress regarding the president’s war powers, with votes expected in both chambers.
Read More
Despite President Trump’s reported approval of a war against Iran, and Israel’s ongoing attack, only a few Democrats are actively opposing further US military involvement. While some have introduced legislation requiring congressional approval for military action as per the War Powers Act, many Democrats publicly support Israel’s actions, influenced heavily by AIPAC lobbying. This stance contrasts sharply with the significant public opposition to US involvement in the conflict, highlighting a disconnect between Democratic politicians and their constituents. Progressive voices strongly urge voters to pressure their representatives to prioritize peace and oppose another US war of choice.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker