According to the Brennan Center, the Trump administration is engaged in a multifaceted strategy to undermine future elections and maintain power, despite any voter outcome. This plan involves actions such as rewriting election rules, targeting election officials, and weakening federal oversight. The report highlights efforts to impose voter ID requirements, potentially disenfranchising millions of voters, along with attempts to control and intimidate those involved in fair election administration. The Brennan Center also points out that Trump’s actions defy the constitutional separation of powers, as the authority to regulate elections rests with Congress and individual states.
Read More
Federal court rules Kansas legislators tried to suppress speech with 2021 advance voting law. This is a pretty significant ruling, and it really highlights the ongoing battle surrounding voting rights and access. The core of the matter revolves around a law, House Bill 2332, passed in 2021, which sought to restrict how advance mail ballot applications were distributed in Kansas. The court found that the motivations behind this law went beyond simply ensuring fair elections and veered into the realm of suppressing free speech.
Specifically, the law was aimed at banning non-Kansas residents or businesses from sending out advance mail ballot applications to voters.… Continue reading
Chris Matthews’ prediction that Democrats have a good chance of picking up 15 to 20 House seats in the midterms sparks a flurry of reactions, ranging from cautious optimism to outright cynicism. The political landscape, already complex, is viewed through a lens of deep-seated concerns about the state of democracy, the potential for electoral manipulation, and the perceived shortcomings of the Democratic Party itself.
The very notion of a fair election is questioned, with some commentators expressing grave doubts about the integrity of the process. The “gestapo” presence at polling places and the potential for voter suppression tactics are highlighted as serious threats to the sanctity of the vote.… Continue reading
The Supreme Court’s consideration of a GOP challenge to mail-in voting represents a significant threat to the accessibility and integrity of the electoral process. This challenge isn’t about a wholesale ban on mail-in voting, a system successfully used for years in several states, including Utah, a traditionally Republican stronghold. Instead, the focus is narrower, targeting the validity of ballots postmarked by the election deadline but arriving later.
The timing of this challenge is highly suspect, surfacing prominently after a presidential election loss. This raises questions about the sincerity of the GOP’s concerns. It appears to be a strategic maneuver aimed at suppressing votes, disproportionately affecting those who rely on mail-in ballots due to logistical barriers or circumstances beyond their control.… Continue reading
Missouri lawmakers are currently attempting to repeal abortion protections that were previously enacted by voters. This move has sparked significant outrage and calls into question the very nature of representative democracy. The blatant disregard for the will of the people raises serious concerns about the integrity of the electoral process and the power dynamics at play.
It seems paradoxical that voters can approve measures through ballot initiatives, only to have those same measures overturned by elected officials. This undermines the fundamental principle of majority rule, suggesting a system where the voices of citizens are easily silenced. The current situation highlights a deeper problem – the potential for elected officials to consistently circumvent the expressed wishes of their constituents.… Continue reading
The Republican Party is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy to restrict voting access, potentially culminating in a one-party state. Central to this is the “Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act,” requiring stringent proof of citizenship for voter registration, and a presidential executive order mandating similar measures and allowing federal oversight of state voter rolls. A federal judge partially blocked the executive order, citing separation of powers, but the SAVE Act remains a significant threat, potentially disenfranchising millions of eligible voters. The Supreme Court, with its conservative majority, holds the ultimate power to determine the constitutionality of these measures.
Read More
A federal court ruled that Alabama intentionally discriminated by refusing to create a second majority-Black congressional district, despite prior legal challenges and Supreme Court rulings. The court found Alabama’s actions, which resulted in only one Black-majority district out of seven, to be a purposeful dilution of Black voters’ power. This decision may place Alabama under Section 3 of the Voting Rights Act, requiring federal preclearance for future congressional maps. The court acknowledged progress in race relations in Alabama but deemed the state’s actions irreconcilable with its claims that the Voting Rights Act is obsolete.
Read More
President Trump’s executive order, aiming to influence future elections, is largely considered a power grab and faces significant legal challenges due to its potential unconstitutionality. Legal experts cite concerns about disenfranchisement, particularly impacting low-propensity voters, a group increasingly vital to the Republican party. The order’s provisions, including challenges to mail-in ballots and data sharing with potentially partisan entities, raise serious questions about election integrity and fairness. A court has already blocked a key element of the order, highlighting the considerable legal hurdles it faces.
Read More
A North Carolina Court of Appeals ruling, decided along party lines, favors Republican Supreme Court candidate Jefferson Griffin, despite his loss to Democrat Allison Riggs. This decision challenges over 65,000 votes, disproportionately affecting young and Black voters, potentially overturning the election results. While 60,000 challenged votes were upheld, thousands more remain contested, jeopardizing the integrity of the election. The outcome could establish a Republican supermajority on the state Supreme Court and severely undermine voter confidence.
Read More
The Ohio Republican Party’s deliberate obfuscation of Issue 1, aimed at preventing fair electoral districting, exemplifies a pattern of manipulative behavior. This follows the conviction of Ohio’s former Republican House Speaker and party chairman for a massive bribery scheme. The author, a long-time Ohio resident, argues that this corruption and disregard for voter understanding renders the Republican Party unworthy of his vote. He urges Ohio voters to carefully consider the implications of electing Republicans, particularly for statewide offices. The author concludes that the party’s actions necessitate a change in leadership to restore integrity to Ohio’s government.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood