Tennessee’s new law criminalizes local officials voting for sanctuary policies, severely restricting representative government and freedom of speech. This content-based restriction allows votes against such policies but prohibits votes in favor, effectively silencing constituents’ voices. The law establishes a dangerous precedent, potentially jeopardizing the right to vote on any issue. This action contrasts sharply with constitutional protections for legislative speech and undermines the principle of popular sovereignty. Legal challenges, not jail time, should be the method for addressing policy disagreements.
Read More
H.R.55, a bill introduced to repeal the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), also known as the Motor Voter Act, is a deeply concerning piece of legislation. This act, signed into law by President Bill Clinton, significantly simplified voter registration, aiming to increase participation, particularly among marginalized groups. The NVRA mandates that states offer voter registration opportunities at various locations, including driver’s license agencies and public assistance offices, making the process significantly more accessible. It also prohibits states from removing registered voters from the rolls unless specific criteria are met, aiming to maintain accurate and up-to-date voter lists.
H.R.55’s proposed repeal would directly contradict the NVRA’s core principles.… Continue reading
The 2024 election was marred by widespread voter suppression, disproportionately impacting voters of color. Millions of voters were purged from rolls, challenged by vigilante groups, or had their ballots disqualified due to minor errors. This suppression, estimated to have cost Kamala Harris at least 3,565,000 votes, likely changed the outcome in key swing states, resulting in a loss for Harris despite winning the popular vote. Without this suppression, Harris would have won the presidency with 286 electoral votes.
Read More
Republican Judge Jefferson Griffin’s lawsuit challenges the results of North Carolina’s Supreme Court election, where he lost to Justice Allison Riggs by a narrow margin. He seeks to invalidate tens of thousands of votes due to alleged registration irregularities, a move legal experts deem an attempt at mass disenfranchisement. This action, supported by the RNC, is seen as setting a dangerous precedent for future elections, potentially undermining faith in the democratic process. The case is currently before both the state Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, with significant implications for the integrity of elections nationwide.
Read More
A North Carolina judge dismissed a Republican National Committee lawsuit seeking to invalidate nearly 60,000 ballots cast in the November 2024 election. The GOP argued that these ballots were illegally cast due to missing identification information on voter registration applications. This action mirrors similar challenges filed by the losing Republican candidate for North Carolina Supreme Court, Jefferson Griffin. The judge’s ruling found insufficient evidence of irreparable harm to warrant a preliminary injunction, rejecting the GOP’s request to set aside the challenged ballots. The Democratic National Committee opposed the lawsuit, characterizing it as a voter suppression tactic.
Read More
Democrats are furious over a North Carolina court decision to discard approximately 60,000 ballots cast in the recent Supreme Court race, denouncing the move as a “rock bottom maneuver” aimed at undermining the democratic process. The sheer scale of the discarded ballots is shocking, and the implications for fair elections are deeply troubling.
This action represents a blatant attempt to influence the outcome of an election, raising serious questions about the integrity of the electoral system. The scale of the disenfranchisement is staggering, impacting tens of thousands of voters whose voices have been effectively silenced. It is a deeply disturbing development, and the outcry from Democrats reflects a profound sense of outrage and concern.… Continue reading
In a crucial North Carolina Supreme Court race, the Democratic Party is suing to prevent the Republican Party from discarding over 60,000 ballots. This action follows a recount affirming Democrat Justice Allison Riggs’s victory by a narrow margin, but Republicans are challenging the validity of numerous ballots. The GOP’s challenges, based on previously rejected legal arguments, target ballots cast by overseas citizens and those lacking specific identification information. The lawsuit seeks a federal court order to prevent the state elections board from invalidating these ballots, citing prior rulings that deemed similar challenges unlawful.
Read More
President-elect Trump announced a plan to overhaul U.S. elections, advocating for paper ballots, same-day voting, voter ID, and proof of citizenship. This plan, previously mentioned in 2016 and reiterated recently, directly opposes recent trends like increased mail-in voting and relaxed voter ID requirements. While claiming to combat fraud, the proposed changes could disproportionately affect certain demographics, potentially disenfranchising rural, disabled, and minority voters. The plan contrasts with Trump’s past actions, including encouraging early voting, including mail-in ballots, in recent elections.
Read More
Calls by prominent Trump supporters to revoke the 19th Amendment, granting women the right to vote, signal a potential broader attack on the electoral system. This movement, fueled by Christian nationalism, frames the repeal not as disenfranchisement, but as restoring a “family vote” where men represent their households. This echoes historical anti-suffragist arguments and aligns with Project 2025, a far-right plan outlining aggressive voter suppression tactics. The ultimate goal appears to be the establishment of a Christian nationalist state, where women’s rights are significantly curtailed or eliminated.
Read More
On Tuesday, numerous polling places and ballot-counting locations across five key battleground states received bomb threats, primarily targeting Democratic-leaning counties. While none of the threats were deemed credible, they appear to have been coordinated and aimed at influencing either the perception or actual outcome of the election. The threats, originating from various sources including Russian and French email services, were largely directed at high-population Democratic counties in states considered crucial for winning the election, such as Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and Detroit, Michigan. Thankfully, preparations for such scenarios minimized disruptions, with locations temporarily closed reopening later that day and no evidence of significant impact on voter turnout.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood