Tennessee Democrats are investigating reports of postcards circulating with an incorrect election date for the special election between Aftyn Behn and Matt Van Epps in the 7th Congressional District. The mailers, which lack attribution, reportedly direct voters to cast their ballots on December 3rd, a day after the actual election. This race has garnered significant attention, with the outcome potentially impacting the balance of power in the House of Representatives, where Republicans currently hold a narrow majority. Turnout levels, particularly in the district’s rural areas and Democratic-leaning Nashville, are expected to play a crucial role in determining the election’s outcome.
Read More
The subject in question is attempting to restrict voting access by advocating for one-day in-person voting, a move considered outdated given modern technology. This approach contrasts with Democratic efforts to expand voting through measures like mail-in voting and early voting. The speaker believes this strategy is an attempt to gain an advantage by potentially altering voting laws to favor a specific outcome. Furthermore, a quote from the subject indicates a belief that these restrictions are necessary to prevent Democrats from gaining power.
Read More
Recent Republican losses have prompted unusual claims from former President Trump, who asserts the party failed due to insufficient promotion of his achievements. Despite acknowledging a problem, Trump’s response involves advocating for the end of the filibuster to implement stricter voting laws, essentially aiming to influence future elections. This strategy, perceived as an attempt to suppress votes and permanently exclude Democrats from power, is discussed by Democratic operative Jessica Post. She analyzes the implications of gerrymandering, its potential consequences for Democrats, and possible repercussions for the GOP, as well as outlining strategies for Democrats to counter Trump’s plans.
Read More
Across the nation, voters showed support for Democrats in key races, delivering defeats to candidates backed by President Trump, including in the New York mayoral race and gubernatorial contests in New Jersey and Virginia. These results are seen as a reflection of voter sentiment regarding Trump’s agenda, offering the first significant evaluation of his policies nine months after he returned to power. Despite the president’s attempts to influence outcomes through endorsements and social media engagement, Democrats celebrated the results as a major victory, while Trump attributed the losses to factors like the federal government shutdown. In Virginia, Democrat Abigail Spanberger was elected, while New Jersey voters opted to retain Democrats in power.
Read More
Non-credible bomb threats temporarily halt voting in Northern New Jersey. It’s unsettling, isn’t it? The news of these disruptions in northern New Jersey, aimed at polling places, immediately raises eyebrows. The knee-jerk reaction might be, “Here we go again,” especially considering the political landscape of the area. It’s a natural inclination to be wary, wondering if the integrity of the voting process is being targeted. The impact of these threats, even if non-credible, is undeniable.
Non-credible bomb threats temporarily halt voting in Northern New Jersey. The suspicion of manipulation, whether deliberate or circumstantial, inevitably creeps in. The timing of such threats, specifically targeting polling locations, immediately raises concerns about the potential for voter suppression.… Continue reading
Multiple polling locations across several New Jersey counties were targeted with bomb threats on Election Day, leading to police investigations and temporary closures. Officials have stated that these threats are not credible. Some polling locations have reopened, while others have been relocated to ensure voter safety. Law enforcement is working with state, local, and federal partners to maintain a safe and smooth election process.
Read More
In a recent ruling, a federal judge has permanently blocked a portion of former President Donald Trump’s executive order regarding voter identification requirements. The order, which aimed to overhaul federal elections, was challenged by various groups and deemed unlawful because it would have required voters to present passports or similar documents to prove citizenship. U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly determined that the U.S. Constitution grants states, not the president, the authority to oversee elections, making this part of the order illegal. The ruling comes amidst ongoing scrutiny of the electoral system and false claims of widespread fraud.
Read More
The article details Donald Trump’s ongoing attempts to discredit the electoral process, now specifically targeting both mail-in and early voting methods. Despite previously utilizing these very methods himself and encouraging his supporters to do the same, he is calling for their elimination. Trump is falsely claiming these methods are proof of Democratic cheating, and urging the Justice Department to investigate the 2020 election outcome. These demands come amid record-breaking early voting turnout in several states, including a concerning shift in Republican voter behavior.
Read More
The crux of it seems to be this: a former Bush aide is suggesting that the suppression of speech, specifically targeting the Democratic Party, is not something on the horizon, but is already happening. The implications are chilling, painting a picture of a future where dissenting voices are silenced, and democratic processes are undermined.
One of the key concerns raised is the potential for legal challenges and the revocation of broadcast licenses for any media outlets that air Democratic candidates’ speeches or advertisements. This echoes the worries of many about a creeping authoritarianism. The scenario painted is one where any expression of dissent, any criticism of the ruling party, could be met with severe repercussions, potentially including criminal charges.… Continue reading
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has issued requests for voter information to numerous states, encompassing both Republican and Democratic-led jurisdictions. Some states were offered access to the federal SAVE database to verify their voter lists. However, legal concerns have been raised by election law experts, who suggest that the request may violate the 1974 Privacy Act. Both Democratic and Republican officials across the country have rejected the DOJ’s requests, citing concerns about the federal government’s overreach into state electoral processes.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood