Despite Adelita Grijalva’s election victory in Arizona’s 7th Congressional District, with nearly 70% of the vote and official certification by the Arizona Secretary of State, she has not been sworn in to the House of Representatives. Speaker Mike Johnson is delaying Grijalva’s swearing-in, using various excuses, and is suspected of doing so because Grijalva is a Democrat whose presence could impact critical votes, like the one involving the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files. This obstruction denies representation to 813,000 Arizona residents, and a lawsuit has been filed to address this voter disenfranchisement, emphasizing that the speaker’s actions violate the Constitution and the principles of democratic representation.
Read More
A North Carolina federal court issued a preliminary order directing election officials to comply with a state court ruling that could disenfranchise thousands of military and overseas voters in a contested state Supreme Court election. However, the federal court also blocked election certification pending a ruling on the state court remedy’s constitutionality. This action risks undermining election legitimacy, mirroring concerns raised in *Bush v. Gore* regarding the premature announcement of questionable vote recounts. Legal experts argue the state court’s actions violate the 14th Amendment’s due process clause by retroactively changing eligibility rules and potentially disenfranchising voters who complied with existing law. The optimal course is to resolve the constitutional questions before attempting to collect further voter information.
Read More
A North Carolina Court of Appeals ruling threatens to invalidate over 60,000 ballots, potentially altering the outcome of the state Supreme Court election. Republican candidate Jefferson Griffin challenged the validity of these votes, despite the incumbent, Justice Allison Riggs, winning by 734 votes after recounts. A dissenting judge argued this action retroactively changes election rules, disenfranchising voters who followed existing guidelines. Riggs plans to appeal, citing the ruling’s potential to undermine democratic processes.
Read More
A North Carolina appeals court issued a 2-1 decision ordering a review of tens of thousands of ballots cast in a closely contested state Supreme Court race. The court found that the State Board of Elections incorrectly allowed these ballots, which predominantly favored the Democratic candidate, ruling that they did not comply with state law. The decision mandates that voters be given an opportunity to provide additional information to validate their ballots, but those lacking proper documentation will have their votes disallowed. This ruling is expected to be appealed to the state Supreme Court and potentially to federal court.
Read More
Following a contested North Carolina Supreme Court election, Republicans on the court temporarily blocked the certification of Democratic Justice Allison Riggs’s victory. This action, stemming from a GOP challenger’s attempt to invalidate over 60,000 votes, despite Riggs winning by 734 votes after recounts, is seen by Democrats as a blatant attempt to seize power. The move has drawn widespread criticism, with accusations of voter disenfranchisement and undermining democratic processes. The court’s actions raise concerns about the future of fair elections and the potential overturning of the election results.
Read More
The Electoral College isn’t worth saving, even if it somehow blocks a Trump win. The very concept that a candidate can lose the popular vote yet still claim the presidency is fundamentally absurd and contradicts the basic principles of democracy. This system creates a scenario where my vote carries a different weight based solely on where I live, which I find deeply frustrating. It’s simply unfair that voters in certain states see their choices amplified over millions of others. Regardless of the political landscape or potential outcomes, the idea of preserving such a flawed mechanism is baffling.
My thoughts shift to the very real implications of voter disenfranchisement inherent in the Electoral College.… Continue reading
The recent news that the Montana voting system was shut down after Kamala Harris was left off the ballot is extremely concerning. As a voter, I rely on the integrity of our electoral system to ensure that my voice is heard and that my vote counts. The fact that such a glaring omission occurred, especially for one of the two major party candidates for Vice President, is unacceptable.
The Secretary of State’s office’s initial response to take down the electronic absentee system for troubleshooting is a step in the right direction. However, the reassurance that very few voters were affected does little to alleviate the concerns over this major oversight.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker