The article examines the perplexing disconnect between American voters’ expressed preferences for policies like universal healthcare and infrastructure and their support for politicians who actively oppose these measures. Three theories are proposed: the “ignorance theory,” which suggests voters are unaware of candidates’ stances; the “Svengali theory,” blaming media propaganda for brainwashing voters; and the “politics-as-entertainment theory,” arguing that voters are more engaged with political spectacle than policy substance. Ultimately, the author posits a “this-is-who-we-are” theory, suggesting that voters may consciously support policies and politicians reflecting their values, even if those values conflict with their material interests, and that American democracy may be faltering as a result.
Read More
A July 2025 survey conducted by Leger, in partnership with 338Canada and Maintenant Media, revealed that 47% of Republican voters stated that official implication of Donald Trump in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking activities would not affect their vote. The survey, which polled around 1,000 American voters, showed that this percentage of Republican voters would still support Trump despite any involvement in Epstein’s crimes. While this demonstrates voter loyalty, other polls indicate a divided perspective on Trump’s handling of the Epstein case and a widespread desire for transparency. Notably, the survey highlighted that the claim that 47% of Republican voters would still support Trump if he were implicated in the Epstein case was accurate.
Read More
Voters promised $100 by a Musk-affiliated political action committee are reporting they haven’t received their promised payment. The situation has sparked a wave of online commentary, ranging from outrage at the alleged broken promise to mockery of those who believed it in the first place. Many commenters express disbelief that anyone would expect payment for their vote, highlighting the perceived absurdity of the situation.
The lack of payment has been met with a mixture of anger and amusement. Some commenters argue that the voters were foolish to believe the promise, labeling them “suckers” and “idiots” for expecting payment from someone with a history of questionable business practices.… Continue reading
Seventy-one percent of Trump voters oppose Medicaid cuts, a statistic that reveals a fascinating internal conflict within a significant segment of the electorate. This seemingly contradictory stance highlights the complex interplay between individual self-interest and broader political affiliations.
This opposition to cuts, however, is specifically targeted at the impact on themselves. The nuance here is critical; the same voters likely support, or at least did not actively oppose, broader Medicaid cuts affecting others. This suggests a selective empathy, a prioritization of personal well-being over a consistent ideology regarding social safety nets.
The assertion that 100% of Trump voters supported Medicaid cuts is a provocative claim.… Continue reading
A recent survey reveals a significant shift in public opinion regarding Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination, with a majority of voters expressing disapproval after learning about his views. This finding underscores a critical issue in the electoral process: the importance of informed decision-making.
It’s a striking outcome, given the extensive media coverage and readily available information concerning Kennedy’s stance on various issues. The fact that many voters only formed a negative opinion *after* learning of these views suggests a concerning lack of prior research and engagement with the candidates’ platforms. It’s a point frequently highlighted in post-election analysis, highlighting the potential consequences of uninformed voting.… Continue reading
No Trump administration pick is viewed positively by most Americans, a sentiment echoed repeatedly across various discussions. This isn’t simply about individual opinions; it speaks to a deeper dissatisfaction with the choices made and the overall political climate. The consistent negativity surrounding these appointments transcends simple disagreement; it reveals a widespread sense of unease and distrust.
The lack of positive public perception isn’t a concern for those in power, a belief frequently expressed. Some argue that the focus on approval ratings is a distraction from the real consequences of these appointments, a pointless exercise in measuring public opinion when actions speak louder than words.… Continue reading
Following last week’s election, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez engaged in a social media Q&A with supporters, seeking to understand the reasoning behind voters who supported both her and Donald Trump. Responses highlighted themes of both candidates being perceived as “outsiders” and prioritizing working-class interests. While some found the responses perplexing, Ocasio-Cortez emphasized the importance of direct communication and community engagement, noting that online spaces often present a distorted view of public opinion. She acknowledged the challenges ahead, but urged continued activism and a refusal to give up in the face of difficult times.
Read More
In the recent midterm elections, voters exhibited a significant trend of “ticket-splitting,” casting ballots for candidates from different parties in different races. This phenomenon, though less common than in the past, proved decisive in key states, particularly in Senate races where Democrats outperformed President Biden’s performance. For example, in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Nevada, Democrats won Senate seats despite the state voting for Trump for president. This suggests that voters are increasingly making nuanced decisions based on individual candidates rather than solely relying on party affiliation, highlighting the continued importance of local campaign efforts and voter outreach.
Read More
Following his loss in the vice presidential election, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz acknowledged the difficulty of understanding the choices of voters who supported President-elect Donald Trump. He emphasized the importance of seeking common ground rather than judgment, encouraging supporters to find unity and continue fighting for their beliefs. Walz also reflected on his campaign experience with Vice President Kamala Harris, observing that voters yearned for a sense of security, opportunity, and freedom in their lives. He expressed his gratitude to Harris for her faith in him and their shared commitment to the ideals of the campaign.
Read More
Rally-goers leaving in droves after Trump’s three-hour delay was a moment that struck me deeply. Here were people who, despite whatever might have been happening in their lives, had spent precious time and resources to attend an event, only to be left waiting like an afterthought. I can’t help but ponder what it means to rally behind someone who exhibits such a lack of respect for his followers. If a candidate cannot manage the logistics of a rally, how can they be trusted to handle the complexities of running a nation? It’s a troubling thought that the very basics of organization seem to be beyond his realm of competence.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood