In Istanbul talks on June 2nd, Ukraine presented Russia with a list of hundreds of deported Ukrainian children, demanding their return. Vladimir Medinsky, head of the Russian delegation, dismissively rejected the list, reportedly mocking the Ukrainian effort as a performance for childless European women. This dismissive response followed prior meetings between Ukrainian delegates and representatives from Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. The incident highlights the ongoing tensions and disagreements surrounding the issue of forcibly deported Ukrainian children.
Read More
Vladimir Putin’s choice of Vladimir Medinsky, a historian with ultranationalist views, to lead the Russian delegation in Istanbul peace talks signals a lack of seriousness. Medinsky, a former culture minister, has a history of promoting a pro-Russian narrative, including authorship or ghostwriting of texts justifying the invasion of Ukraine. His past negotiating efforts have been unsuccessful, marked by demands for Ukrainian capitulation. This low-level delegation, lacking Kremlin heavyweights, is widely seen as a symbolic gesture rather than a genuine attempt at peace.
Read More
Following Russia’s first direct talks with Ukraine in three years, Kremlin negotiator Vladimir Medinsky expressed satisfaction with the discussions and a commitment to continued negotiations. He invoked the 21-year Great Northern War as a historical precedent for Russia’s willingness to sustain its military campaign in Ukraine indefinitely. Medinsky reportedly conveyed Russia’s preparedness for a prolonged conflict, emphasizing their resolve even at the cost of further casualties. This stance suggests a hardened negotiating position and a commitment to achieving their objectives regardless of the duration required.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker