Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy plan to utilize recent Supreme Court decisions in *West Virginia v. EPA* and *Loper Bright* to dismantle federal regulations, believing these rulings expand executive power to do so. However, legal experts contend this interpretation is flawed, arguing the rulings actually restrict agency authority and complicate the process of overturning existing rules. The process of removing regulations is lengthy, resource-intensive, and faces potential legal challenges. Therefore, achieving significant deregulation will be considerably more difficult than Musk and Ramaswamy suggest.
Read More
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s “DOGE Plan” proposes drastic federal government restructuring, advocating for significant staff reductions based on a flawed premise of an overly large and inefficient bureaucracy. Their plan, lacking concrete details and expertise, hinges on an undefined “lean team” and the deployment of “advanced technology,” despite the significant existing reliance on government contractors. The authors’ conflicts of interest, notably Musk’s dealings with the federal government and Trump’s potential protection of the oil and gas industry, undermine their claims of disinterested reform. Ultimately, the plan’s reliance on unsubstantiated assertions and lack of practical implementation strategies render it unrealistic and potentially harmful.
Read More
In a recent op-ed, Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy propose a plan to combat the influence of unelected civil servants, ironically positioning themselves as outside volunteers who will “cut costs” despite lacking the authority to do so directly. Their plan involves assembling a team within the White House Office of Management and Budget to make recommendations for cost-cutting measures. However, this approach raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and opportunities for self-enrichment given their lack of accountability. The authors’ proposal essentially advocates for indirect influence, contrasting their volunteer status with the very civil service protections they criticize.
Read More
Ocasio-Cortez’s reaction to the collaboration between Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Marjorie Taylor Greene is undeniably noteworthy. She labeled the situation “actually hilarious,” a sentiment that reflects a widespread perception of the unlikely alliance. The humor, of course, stems from the starkly contrasting political ideologies and personalities involved.
The pairing of Musk and Ramaswamy, both known for their often controversial and disruptive approaches to business and politics, with Greene, a figure consistently associated with extreme conservative views, presents a fascinating, and to some, amusing juxtaposition. It suggests an intriguing strategic dynamic, perhaps a calculated attempt to shake up the existing political landscape.… Continue reading
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, tasked with curbing federal spending, propose eliminating programs lacking explicit spending authorizations, a claim refuted by federal fiscal experts. This misunderstanding stems from conflating authorization (establishing program parameters) with appropriation (allocating funds), which Congress always legally authorizes. Experts argue that lapsing authorizations don’t signify wasteful spending; instead, they often grant agencies flexibility. Ultimately, DOGE’s recommendations are non-binding, leaving final budget decisions to Congress.
Read More
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, leading a new “Department of Government Efficiency,” aim to slash $500 billion from the federal budget by leveraging recent Supreme Court rulings in *West Virginia v. EPA* and *Loper Bright*. These rulings, they argue, allow for the overturning of thousands of federal regulations and potential mass firings of federal workers, despite legal challenges. Their plan targets funding for international organizations, public broadcasting, and Planned Parenthood, relying on executive action and the courts’ interpretation of Congressional authority. Legal experts, however, warn of the potential for this approach to weaponize the courts against critical federal regulations and programs.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency, led by Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon Musk, plans sweeping changes to the federal workforce. This includes mass layoffs (“reductions-in-force”), a mandated return to five-day workweeks in offices, and significant cuts to federal contracting. Ramaswamy cites recent Supreme Court decisions as justification, claiming they provide legal grounds for these actions, though experts dispute the feasibility and legality of such large-scale changes. These proposals face significant hurdles, including existing collective bargaining agreements and congressional oversight.
Read More
Ramaswamy’s statement, “We expect certain agencies to be deleted outright,” immediately raises concerns about the potential consequences of such drastic actions. The casual way this sweeping change is discussed is deeply unsettling, especially considering the profound impact it would have on countless individuals and the nation as a whole.
The sheer scale of potential job losses alone is staggering. Thousands of federal employees could face unemployment, a situation that ripples far beyond the individuals directly affected, impacting families and communities across the country. This isn’t merely about “departments and agencies;” it’s about real people losing their livelihoods and the vital services they provide ceasing to function.… Continue reading
Vivek Ramaswamy, alongside Elon Musk, plans significant cuts to the US federal government, potentially eliminating entire agencies. Their aim includes “deleting” the Department of Education, redirecting its $80 billion budget to parents, and implementing mass deregulation. Ramaswamy emphasizes the need for swift action and expects substantial reductions in federal workforce and contractor spending. This initiative is part of a broader strategy for deep government restructuring.
Read More
Senate Majority Leader John Thune supports President-elect Trump’s new Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, believing it will create a leaner, more efficient federal government. This initiative aims to cut waste, reduce regulations, and potentially relocate agencies outside Washington D.C., a move Thune supports, citing low in-person work rates among federal employees. However, concerns have been raised by the American Federation of Government Employees about potential cuts to vital social programs resulting from the initiative and proposed tax reductions. Thune also indicated openness to enabling Trump to utilize recess appointment authority to bypass Senate confirmation for certain nominees.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
AOC Calls Musk-Greene Partnership Hilariously Inept
Ocasio-Cortez’s reaction to the collaboration between Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Marjorie Taylor Greene is undeniably noteworthy. She labeled the situation “actually hilarious,” a sentiment that reflects a widespread perception of the unlikely alliance. The humor, of course, stems from the starkly contrasting political ideologies and personalities involved.
The pairing of Musk and Ramaswamy, both known for their often controversial and disruptive approaches to business and politics, with Greene, a figure consistently associated with extreme conservative views, presents a fascinating, and to some, amusing juxtaposition. It suggests an intriguing strategic dynamic, perhaps a calculated attempt to shake up the existing political landscape.… Continue reading