Vivek Ramaswamy

Ramaswamy Slammed for “American Workers Suck” Rant

Marianne Williamson’s announcement of her 2024 presidential bid highlights her concern for Americans struggling with economic hardship and a perceived disconnect from the Democratic Party. While advocating for progressive policies like Medicare for All and reparations, Williamson holds controversial stances on vaccines and has expressed views deemed insensitive and inaccurate regarding Haitians. Her campaign will likely face scrutiny over these contrasting positions, particularly her past statements dismissing concerns about Trump’s rhetoric. The inherent tension between her progressive ideals and controversial opinions presents a significant challenge for her campaign.

Read More

Dogecoin, Billionaires, and Trillions in Federal Waste: A Reckless Plan?

The purportedly efficiency-focused “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE), headed by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, proposes drastic government cuts totaling $2 trillion. Their plan targets programs like veterans’ benefits and the NIH, while neglecting far larger sources of waste. Instead of addressing the Pentagon’s inefficiencies or the massive cost of wasteful tax breaks, DOGE’s focus appears to be on slashing essential services and privatizing government functions. Significant tax loopholes, such as those benefiting private retirement plans and capital gains, represent trillions in lost revenue and disproportionately benefit the wealthy.

Read More

Musk, Ramaswamy Signal Social Security Cuts: Anger Erupts Over Retirement Threat

Despite President-elect Trump’s public assertion that Social Security will remain untouched, statements from his allies and his own past actions contradict this claim. Key figures like Musk and Ramaswamy have indicated openness to cuts, while Trump himself previously suggested and even proposed budget cuts to the program. This contrasts sharply with widespread public support for Social Security and opposition to benefit reductions. The ultimate fate of Social Security under the Trump administration remains uncertain.

Read More

Elon & Vivek Threaten MAGA Voters’ Social Security

Proposed $2 trillion federal budget cuts, advocated by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, threaten significant reductions to Social Security. This initiative contrasts sharply with the 79% of Americans opposing Social Security benefit cuts. While Musk and Ramaswamy’s influence is limited, their recommendations pressure Congress, despite President Trump’s repeated promises to protect Social Security. Ultimately, the power to enact budget changes remains with Congress, not the self-appointed “Department of Government Efficiency.”

Read More

Ramaswamy’s Secret Musk Attack: Resurfaced Audio Exposes GOP Infighting

Pete Hegseth’s Senate confirmation hearing is underway, marked by his mother’s impassioned defense of his character, claiming he has changed since past accusations. She vehemently attacked the media for its reporting on these allegations, which include rape, sexual harassment, and financial mismanagement. Hegseth himself aims to convince senators of his transformation, despite concerns about his past behavior and his outspoken Christian nationalism. His nomination remains uncertain.

Read More

Ramaswamy Called Musk a ‘Circus Monkey’: GOP Infighting and Hypocrisy

Vivek Ramaswamy previously criticized Elon Musk, accusing him of being beholden to the Chinese government and prioritizing business interests in China over U.S. interests. Ramaswamy highlighted Musk’s interactions with Chinese officials and his stances on Taiwan as evidence of this alleged subservience. However, both now serve together in President Trump’s unofficial “Department of Government Efficiency,” a position that benefits both men financially. Their newfound friendship suggests a prioritization of political alignment over previous criticisms. This raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the use of the department to benefit Musk’s companies.

Read More

Musk’s DOGE Plan: Deregulation Plot or Government Dismantling?

Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s proposed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) aims to drastically reduce the federal government, aligning with the incoming Trump administration’s broader goals. This plan involves eliminating “thousands” of regulations and minimizing government employees, potentially serving as a vehicle for a Musk-led shadow presidency or a method to placate him. The proposal leverages the recent *Loper Bright* Supreme Court decision, weakening the power of federal agencies, and echoes earlier right-wing efforts to dismantle the civil service. Ultimately, DOGE’s goals resemble the more radical “Retire All Government Employees” plan, advocating for deregulation and concentrating power within a select group.

Read More

Ex-Trump Official Dismisses Musk’s DOGE Task Force as a Sham

Despite expressing respect for Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s efforts, former White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney asserts that their newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) lacks statutory authority and is primarily a public relations initiative. While acknowledging DOGE’s goal to improve government efficiency, Mulvaney highlights its inability to enact meaningful change without congressional action or collaboration with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). He emphasizes that the OMB director, Russ Vought, will ultimately hold the most significant influence on DOGE’s success. Therefore, the department’s impact will hinge on its ability to leverage congressional support and OMB cooperation.

Read More

Ramaswamy to Scrutinize Biden Loan to Tesla Rival Rivian

Vivek Ramaswamy, incoming head of the Department of Government Efficiency, plans to investigate a $6.6 billion loan the Biden administration gave to electric vehicle manufacturer Rivian. Ramaswamy alleges the loan, intended to fund a Georgia plant, is excessively expensive per job created and politically motivated to undermine Tesla. Critics, including the *Wall Street Journal*, contend the loan constitutes corporate welfare, favoring a struggling company in a competitive market and potentially violating free-market principles. The loan’s justification is debated, with counterarguments highlighting Rivian’s potential economic impact and the risks of stifling nascent clean energy technologies.

Read More