Vindictiveness

Judge Finds Potential Trump Administration Vindictiveness in Abrego Garcia Case

A federal judge believes the Justice Department may have brought criminal charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia out of vindictiveness after his successful lawsuit against the Trump administration for his wrongful deportation to El Salvador. The judge cited evidence suggesting the government sought retaliation, potentially to deter Abrego Garcia from further legal action. Abrego Garcia’s lawyers are now seeking to dismiss the charges and gather evidence to prove the administration’s improper motives, which may include testimony from officials. If successful, it could be an embarrassing outcome for the Justice Department, especially considering public statements from officials and the unusually delayed nature of the charges.

Read More

Judge Finds Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s Charges May Stem from Trump Administration’s Vindictiveness

A federal judge believes the immigrant defendant, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, may have been targeted with a criminal charge by the Justice Department out of vindictiveness for suing the Trump administration. The judge is allowing further evidence gathering and a hearing to investigate this claim, potentially including testimony from officials. This follows Abrego Garcia’s wrongful removal to El Salvador and subsequent indictment for transporting undocumented immigrants after a 2022 traffic stop, with the timing of the charges being unusually delayed. Furthermore, public statements from administration officials and a Deputy Attorney General’s comments on TV have raised suspicions of an improper motive, potentially providing direct evidence of vindictiveness.

Read More