Todd Blanche has sought to prevent state bar regulators from investigating ethical breaches by government lawyers, even proposing a rule to strip local disciplinary officials of their authority. This effort is seen as an attempt by Trump’s lawyers to avoid professional discipline, their only potential accountability. Despite these actions, the Campaign for Accountability has requested investigations into Blanche’s role in the prosecution of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, citing a federal judge’s findings that the prosecution was vindictive. This complaint highlights the tension between the Justice Department’s actions and the legal profession’s oversight mechanisms, questioning whether state bar associations will uphold their responsibilities when powerful individuals are involved.
Read More
A federal judge dismissed human smuggling charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia, ruling that the prosecution was a retaliatory measure for his successful lawsuit challenging his mistaken deportation. The judge cited “selective or vindictive prosecution” due to the timing of the charges and inflammatory statements from top Trump administration officials. This ruling represents a significant rebuke to the Justice Department, which has been accused of politically motivated prosecutions. Despite the dismissal, Abrego Garcia’s immigration status remains uncertain, with threats of deportation to African nations.
Read More
Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted again, this time over a social media photo of seashells arranged in a specific number sequence that officials allege constituted a threat against President Donald Trump. This second indictment, secured by acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, a Trump loyalist, follows an earlier dismissed case and intensifies accusations of vindictive prosecution against a political opponent. Comey maintains the numbers were not intended as a threat and denies any wrongdoing, asserting his innocence and belief in the judiciary. His legal team plans to vigorously contest the charges, arguing they infringe upon First Amendment rights.
Read More
Attorneys for Kilmar Abrego Garcia are seeking to dismiss human smuggling charges, arguing the prosecution is vindictive. Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran citizen with U.S. family, was mistakenly deported and subsequently returned after a Supreme Court ruling. He now faces charges based on a traffic stop where authorities suspected smuggling, but he was initially allowed to proceed with a warning. U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw has expressed concern over potential vindictive prosecution, citing statements from Trump administration officials that suggest the charges may be retaliatory.
Read More
In a recent turn of events, former FBI Director James Comey is seeking dismissal of his criminal case, alleging vindictive prosecution driven by President Trump’s hostility. Comey’s legal team has filed motions in federal court, arguing the indictment is flawed, particularly citing the unlawful appointment of the prosecutor, Lindsey Halligan. Furthermore, Comey’s lawyers claim Halligan’s actions should be nullified due to her improper installation, violating federal law. The charges, related to Comey’s 2020 Senate testimony, were filed just before the statute of limitations expired, adding further complexity to the situation.
Read More
The revelation of a message could create significant legal challenges for Trump and the DOJ, potentially providing grounds for James Comey and others to dismiss indictments. Comey’s attorney is reportedly exploring a dismissal based on “vindictive prosecution,” arguing the charges stem from animus rather than legitimate legal reasons. Even though motions for vindictive prosecution are uncommon, Comey’s case is strengthened by Trump’s public animosity. Further communications between Trump and DOJ officials could further demonstrate the prosecution’s vindictiveness.
Read More
A federal judge is considering whether to dismiss the criminal case against Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran immigrant, due to potentially “vindictive” prosecution by the government. The judge cited statements from Trump administration officials, including a Deputy Attorney General, as possible “direct evidence” of retaliatory motives related to Abrego Garcia’s legal challenges to his wrongful deportation. These statements, coupled with the timing of the criminal indictment, suggest a potential link between the charges and Abrego Garcia’s exercise of his constitutional rights. More hearings are scheduled to determine whether the prosecution was indeed motivated by retaliation.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker