Following President Trump’s inauguration, Elon Musk’s appointees at the Treasury Department attempted to halt USAID payments using the department’s payment system. This request, deemed legally dubious by Acting Secretary David Lebryk, sparked a conflict between political appointees and career civil servants. The ensuing controversy led to Lebryk’s resignation and a tense political debate over the extent of access granted to Musk’s team, with conflicting reports on whether their access was “read-only” or permitted broader control over the system. This incident raises significant concerns about potential executive overreach and the politicization of federal funds. The matter is currently under investigation.
Read More
Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is aggressively targeting USAID, potentially leading to its dissolution. This action coincides with an ongoing USAID inspector general investigation into a public-private partnership between Musk’s Starlink and Ukraine. Multiple federal agencies have expressed concerns about the legality of DOGE’s actions, which are facing lawsuits alleging violations of federal privacy laws. The situation highlights the complex interplay between Musk’s attacks on USAID, the ongoing Starlink investigation, and potential legal ramifications for DOGE.
Read More
A Congressional Research Service report confirms that President Trump lacks unilateral authority to abolish USAID, requiring congressional authorization for such actions. Despite this, Elon Musk, with Trump’s approval, sought to shut down the agency. Simultaneously, Secretary of State Rubio assumed acting directorship of USAID, initiating a review of its activities with potential reorganization. The administration’s actions, including a foreign aid freeze and staff removals, have prompted congressional concerns about compliance with notification and funding regulations.
Read More
Beginning Friday, thousands of USAID’s direct-hire personnel will be placed on administrative leave, excluding those in mission-critical roles, leadership, or designated programs. This action, driven by the Trump administration’s claims of agency waste and inefficiency, follows a freeze on foreign assistance and has sparked protests from staff and Democratic lawmakers citing potential harm to national security and vulnerable populations. The move is part of broader cuts orchestrated in coordination with Elon Musk, and while a complete closure of USAID requires Congressional action, the ongoing upheaval raises serious concerns about the future of global humanitarian aid. Affected employees were notified by Thursday afternoon.
Read More
USAID’s future is uncertain, with conflicting reports suggesting either closure or absorption into the State Department. Secretary Rubio appointed Pete Marocco, a former Trump appointee with a controversial past, to oversee the transition. Marocco faces accusations of participating in the January 6th Capitol riot and a history of disruptive behavior within various government agencies, leading to concerns about his suitability for the role. His appointment, along with other questionable Trump loyalists within the State Department, raises significant concerns among USAID staff.
Read More
President Trump’s executive order freezing foreign aid, impacting USAID, has severely hampered efforts to combat the global HIV/AIDS epidemic, despite claims that “lifesaving” work was exempt. Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has drastically restructured USAID, leading to widespread staff email account suspensions and administrative leave, effectively halting vital work. While PEPFAR, a crucial AIDS relief program, received an emergency waiver, communication breakdowns and logistical obstacles continue to prevent the resumption of its lifesaving activities. This demonstrates the ineffectiveness of the waiver process in ensuring continued aid delivery to vulnerable populations.
Read More
Trump ‘does not have the authority to abolish’ USAID, according to the Congressional Research Service. This assertion highlights a critical point of contention within the current political climate: the extent of presidential power, particularly when challenged by established legal and constitutional frameworks. The very fact that such a declaration needs to be made underscores a growing concern about the erosion of checks and balances within the American system of government.
The issue isn’t simply about USAID’s potential dismantling; it’s symbolic of a broader pattern. Previous attempts to curtail or eliminate USAID, such as those under Nixon, reveal a recurring pattern where those seeking authoritarian power tend to view foreign aid as an obstacle.… Continue reading
Elon Musk, effectively acting as a shadow president, is illegally seizing control of the U.S. Treasury Department, bypassing Congress’s authority over federal spending. He’s crowdsourcing spending decisions from a group of far-right extremists and internet personalities on X, resulting in the targeting of programs like USAID. This action undermines established legal processes and potentially jeopardizes crucial domestic programs based on the whims of unelected individuals. Musk’s actions demonstrate a dangerous disregard for the rule of law and democratic processes, potentially paving the way for broader dismantling of government institutions.
Read More
Democrats were blocked from entering USAID headquarters, and the situation is sparking outrage and fueling calls for immediate action. The incident itself is being described as unacceptable, outrageous, and possibly illegal, with accusations of trespassing and even an attempted coup being leveled against those responsible.
The fact that unelected individuals, possibly associated with a private billionaire, were able to access the building while elected officials were denied entry is seen as a gross violation of established norms and potentially the law. This action is viewed as deeply problematic given that USAID is a government agency funded to support American foreign policy objectives.… Continue reading
Rep. Ilhan Omar condemned President Trump’s closure of the USAID headquarters, characterizing the action as a step toward dictatorship and a constitutional crisis. This closure, preventing staff access and halting congressionally authorized payments, represents an alleged power grab undermining Congress’s authority over the purse. Omar, who personally benefited from USAID aid as a refugee, highlighted the agency’s crucial role in fostering international goodwill and American compassion. The Democrats argue that Trump lacks the authority to unilaterally halt funding allocated by Congress.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood