President Trump’s executive order formally withdraws the United States from the Paris Agreement, a 2015 accord committing nearly 200 nations to curbing global warming. This decision, defying overwhelming scientific consensus, ignores the escalating climate crisis evidenced by record-breaking temperatures in 2024. The agreement aimed to limit global temperature increases to 1.5-2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, a goal now further jeopardized by this withdrawal. Critics argue the move demonstrates a disregard for both domestic and global consequences of climate change.
Read More
For only $29, readers can access the FT Digital Edition for three months. This subscription provides complete access to the Financial Times newspaper, on any device. Importantly, this offer excludes access to ft.com and the FT app. The subscription offers a cost-effective way to enjoy the full print edition digitally.
Read More
A wargame simulated a 2nd Trump presidency, and the shocking conclusion was that NATO would collapse. Now, this may sound like a far-fetched scenario to some, but the reality is that Trump himself has openly stated his intention to pull the US out of NATO. This move would undoubtedly deal a significant blow to the alliance, as the US is not only the largest but also the most well-funded member of NATO. It’s crucial to understand the implications of such a decision, as NATO plays a pivotal role in ensuring global security and stability.
The collapse of NATO would undoubtedly embolden the enemies of the alliance, particularly those who seek to undermine Western democracies.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker