Former President Trump called for the retrieval of billions of dollars worth of U.S. military equipment left in Afghanistan following the withdrawal, claiming it is now being sold by the Taliban. He specifically cited the abandonment of Bagram Air Base and the transfer of equipment to the Afghan National Army as contributing factors. Trump’s suggestion would necessitate a re-invasion of Afghanistan, a highly complex and potentially costly undertaking. Defense experts note that much of this equipment was either demilitarized or transferred to Afghan forces prior to the withdrawal.
Read More
Israel, citing the UN Human Rights Council’s (UNHRC) biased treatment and failure to condemn Hamas’ October 7th massacre, has withdrawn its observer status. This decision follows the US withdrawal and reflects Israel’s view that the UNHRC disproportionately criticizes Israel while ignoring widespread human rights abuses by other member states. The UNHRC’s alleged obsession with condemning Israel, including over 100 condemnatory resolutions, prompted this action. Israel’s ambassador to UN institutions in Geneva will cease participation in UNHRC discussions but will remain in his post at other UN bodies.
Read More
Following his initial order for the U.S. to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) due to perceived mismanagement of the COVID-19 pandemic and other global health crises, President Trump later suggested a potential return. This reversal came during a rally in Las Vegas, where he indicated a rejoining might be considered, contingent on necessary reforms. His statement highlighted concerns over the U.S.’s disproportionately high financial contributions compared to other nations, specifically mentioning China. This marks Trump’s second attempt to sever ties with the WHO.
Read More
President Trump’s executive order formally withdraws the United States from the Paris Agreement, a 2015 accord committing nearly 200 nations to curbing global warming. This decision, defying overwhelming scientific consensus, ignores the escalating climate crisis evidenced by record-breaking temperatures in 2024. The agreement aimed to limit global temperature increases to 1.5-2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, a goal now further jeopardized by this withdrawal. Critics argue the move demonstrates a disregard for both domestic and global consequences of climate change.
Read More
For only $29, readers can access the FT Digital Edition for three months. This subscription provides complete access to the Financial Times newspaper, on any device. Importantly, this offer excludes access to ft.com and the FT app. The subscription offers a cost-effective way to enjoy the full print edition digitally.
Read More
A wargame simulated a 2nd Trump presidency, and the shocking conclusion was that NATO would collapse. Now, this may sound like a far-fetched scenario to some, but the reality is that Trump himself has openly stated his intention to pull the US out of NATO. This move would undoubtedly deal a significant blow to the alliance, as the US is not only the largest but also the most well-funded member of NATO. It’s crucial to understand the implications of such a decision, as NATO plays a pivotal role in ensuring global security and stability.
The collapse of NATO would undoubtedly embolden the enemies of the alliance, particularly those who seek to undermine Western democracies.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker