US v Nixon

Reagan-Appointed Judge Resigns, Condemns Trump’s Actions as Threat to Democracy

Judge Mark L. Wolf, a Reagan-appointed jurist, resigned from the federal judiciary due to concerns about Donald Trump’s use of the law for partisan purposes and the president’s assault on the rule of law. Wolf, who previously served in the Justice Department, felt compelled to speak out against the White House’s actions, which he views as an existential threat to democracy. He directly compared Trump’s actions to those of Nixon, emphasizing the severity of the current situation. Wolf hopes to act as a spokesperson for other judges who are unable to speak candidly about the current administration.

Read More

Supreme Court will hear Trump presidential immunity argument April 25

The Supreme Court will hear the Trump presidential immunity argument on April 25th, and the implications of this decision are significant. The debate around whether a president should have absolute immunity has been ongoing, but it is essential to consider the precedent set by US v Nixon, where it was unanimously decided that the President does not have absolute immunity.

The delay in the Supreme Court’s decision is frustrating, especially when there are pending elections that could be impacted by the outcome. It is crucial to recognize that no one, not even the President, should be above the law. Granting immunity to a former President could set a dangerous precedent and undermine the principles of democracy and justice.… Continue reading