The Shopping Trends team operates independently from CTV News journalists. Our recommendations may result in a commission if a purchase is made via provided links. Full disclosure regarding our team and processes can be found on our “about us” page.
This website is best viewed with a modern, up-to-date browser. Using an outdated browser exposes users to potential security vulnerabilities. For optimal performance and security, please upgrade to a supported browser such as Chrome, Firefox, Edge, or Safari. Failure to update may result in a diminished user experience. Switching browsers is simple and significantly improves online safety.
The successful expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline, enabling increased Canadian oil exports to China and Japan, is prompting consideration of further decoupling from the U.S. market. This renewed interest stems from concerns over U.S. trade unpredictability and is fueling discussions to revive stalled pipeline projects like Energy East and Northern Gateway. While these projects face significant hurdles, including environmental opposition and high costs, expanding Trans Mountain’s capacity presents a quicker alternative to increase exports and capitalize on growing Asian demand. This shift is already impacting global oil markets, with Canada’s crude increasingly replacing that from sanctioned nations.
Amidst threatened U.S. tariffs and stalled talks with traditional partners like the U.K. and India, Canada is actively diversifying its trade relationships. The recently signed free trade agreement with Ecuador marks the 16th such deal in eight years, demonstrating a successful strategy to expand markets beyond traditional partners. This diversification includes ongoing negotiations with ASEAN countries and exploratory discussions with the Philippines, showcasing Canada’s proactive approach to securing economic partnerships. However, challenges remain, notably the upcoming review of CUSMA and ongoing tensions with the U.S. regarding dairy trade.
This section details the range of plans offered in your region. A comprehensive overview of available options allows you to compare features and pricing to find the best fit. Explore various plan details to make an informed decision about your coverage needs. This ensures you select a plan that best suits your individual circumstances and budget. Further details on each plan are readily accessible.
President Trump issued executive orders imposing 25% tariffs on all goods from Mexico and Canada, and a 10% tariff on Canadian oil and Chinese imports, citing the opioid crisis and illegal immigration as justification. These tariffs, effective immediately, include a retaliation clause to escalate if trade partners retaliate with their own tariffs. The decision, made without prior negotiation, has drawn significant criticism for potentially sparking a trade war and raising consumer prices. Despite claims that tariffs stimulate success, economists warn of negative economic consequences for both the U.S. and its trading partners, including potential recessions in Mexico and increased costs of living in the US.
President Trump definitively announced plans to impose tariffs on the European Union, citing unfair treatment by the bloc. This follows confirmation that new tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China will proceed as scheduled this weekend, despite earlier reports suggesting a delay. The tariffs, set to begin February 1st, are expected to provoke retaliatory measures from affected nations. These actions represent a significant escalation of trade tensions with key U.S. trading partners.
On his inauguration day, President Trump opted against immediately imposing tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China, despite previous threats. Instead, he will direct agencies to investigate trade deficits and unfair trade practices from these countries. While this provides temporary relief for Canada, the threat of future tariffs remains, with Canada prepared to retaliate with its own tariffs on American goods should they be imposed. The decision to delay tariff implementation allows Trump to prioritize other inaugural day initiatives, but Canada remains vigilant and is proactively engaging with the Trump administration on trade concerns.
A study reveals a troubling correlation between political donations to the Republican Party and the likelihood of US firms receiving tariff exemptions, suggesting that the process is politically influenced. This exemption approval, which can provide years of financial benefits to companies, appears to favor those who support the Republican Party over those supporting Democrats. Researchers express concern that this politicization undermines the intended impartiality of the tariff exemption process. The reappointment of key personnel within the US trade representative’s office further suggests that this pattern may continue.
Despite intense lobbying efforts, President-elect Trump remains steadfast in his plan to impose significant tariffs on US allies, a decision surprising even some within his own circle. Executives are struggling to influence his thinking, hampered by his unilateral decision-making process and late-night social media announcements. His advisors, including Senator Rubio, often receive minimal advance notice of these policy shifts, leaving them scrambling to react. This lack of internal coordination and the President-elect’s firm stance suggest significant challenges ahead for those hoping to avert the proposed tariffs.
John Q. Hosedrinker