The family of a Colombian fisherman, Alejandro Carranza, killed in a US strike in the Caribbean has filed a complaint with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR). The petition alleges Carranza’s extrajudicial killing violated his human rights, and names US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth as responsible, also claiming President Trump ratified his conduct. Since September, the US has conducted multiple strikes on alleged drug trafficking boats, and the petitioners seek compensation for Carranza’s family and an end to such killings. The IACHR is now involved and has expressed concerns about the US strikes.
Read More
Family of Trinidadian man believed killed in US strike demands proof of drug trafficking, and frankly, it’s a pretty reasonable request. When a life is taken, especially in what appears to be a military operation, the burden of proof shouldn’t be on the bereaved family to *disprove* accusations. It should be on those who authorized the strike to demonstrate the necessity and legality of their actions. Simply put, if the claim is that the man was involved in drug trafficking and that justified his death, then let’s see the evidence.
The argument that even if he *was* involved in illicit activities, blowing up a boat full of people is wrong, is pretty hard to argue with, even without the legal context.… Continue reading
US strikes destroyed only one of three Iranian nuclear sites, according to the latest reports, which is a situation that immediately raises a lot of questions, doesn’t it? There’s a general sense of unease and mistrust surrounding the entire situation, and honestly, it’s hard to blame anyone for feeling that way. The problem is, the narrative keeps shifting. First, we heard the program was completely obliterated, then it was reported that nothing was actually destroyed, just damaged. Now, one site is confirmed destroyed. It’s all just a confusing mess, and frankly, it doesn’t instill much confidence in the official accounts.
One of the biggest hurdles is trusting the information that comes from the administration, especially when there are so many conflicting reports.… Continue reading
Following the weekend’s bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, uncertainty arose regarding the extent of the damage inflicted. While initial claims suggested total destruction and decades of setback, leaked Pentagon assessments indicated the Iranian program was only set back by a few months. Conflicting statements from US officials, including the president, further fueled this ambiguity, as they vacillated between declaring severe damage and admitting to inconclusive intelligence. Simultaneously, Israel claimed significant setbacks for Iran’s nuclear ambitions, adding to the complex narrative. These differing assessments and the potential for a return to conflict cast doubt on the long-term ramifications.
Read More
A preliminary US intelligence assessment, produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency, indicates that the recent US military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities likely only set back Iran’s nuclear program by a few months, rather than “obliterating” it as claimed by President Trump. The assessment, based on a battle damage assessment, suggests that key components such as enriched uranium and centrifuges remained largely intact. This assessment contrasts with the White House’s stance and Trump’s assertions of complete destruction, which have been disputed by the US military. Further assessments are ongoing, and both House and Senate briefings on the operation have been postponed or delayed.
Read More
Following the US air strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer called for restraint, warning of a risk of escalation beyond the region. The UK, while informed of the strikes, was not involved, and Starmer stated that all necessary measures were taken to protect British interests and personnel. The Prime Minister, alongside Emmanuel Macron and Friedrich Merz, urged Iran not to take further destabilizing actions and called for negotiations regarding its nuclear program. In response to the strikes, British Airways cancelled flights to the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood