Despite President-elect Trump’s claim of a “powerful mandate” following his electoral college victory, his narrow popular vote margin—near the bottom for American presidents—raises questions about the extent of public support for his agenda. While Republicans cite his electoral success and control of Congress as evidence of a mandate, Democrats argue the results do not justify circumventing established processes, such as Senate confirmation for Cabinet members. Scholars further dispute the very concept of a presidential mandate, highlighting its historical misuse and potential for undermining democratic balance of power. Ultimately, Trump’s ability to enact his ambitious policies hinges on his approach to governing and whether he can build consensus beyond his base.
Read More
The current electoral college system allows for a presidential candidate to win without securing the national popular vote, as evidenced by recent elections. This system disproportionately focuses campaigning efforts on a few swing states, ignoring the concerns of voters elsewhere. A winner-take-all allocation of electoral votes disenfranchises voters in states leaning heavily towards one party. Reforming the system to proportionally allocate electoral votes based on the popular vote within each state would ensure every vote counts and lessen the chance of a popular vote loser winning the presidency. This reform, while potentially maintaining the electoral college, would address many of its current flaws.
Read More
Following the November elections, the GOP will hold a razor-thin majority in the House, a mere 220 seats to the Democrats’ 215—the smallest since the Hoover administration. This narrow margin is further threatened by the confirmed resignation of one Republican representative and the anticipated resignations of two more. These resignations, stemming from appointments to the Trump administration, would shrink the GOP’s majority even further. The potential loss of three seats highlights the precarious position of the Republican party’s House control.
Read More
US farm groups are appealing to Donald Trump to exempt their workforce from deportation, a request that highlights the complex and often contradictory nature of political alliances. This situation underscores a critical point: the consequences of political choices often extend far beyond the ballot box, impacting not just individuals, but entire industries.
The predicament faced by these farm groups serves as a stark reminder of the importance of careful consideration before casting a vote. The consequences of supporting a candidate with a clearly stated policy on immigration, such as mass deportation, can have immediate and devastating consequences for those who rely on undocumented workers.… Continue reading
Facing a looming Trump presidency, President Biden is urged to utilize his remaining time to counter anticipated policy reversals. Key actions include halting the expansion of immigration detention facilities, commuting death row sentences, and expediting the distribution of funds allocated to climate, healthcare, and infrastructure projects. Advocacy groups are pushing for these measures to protect civil liberties and mitigate the potential impact of Trump’s agenda. Despite limitations inherent in a lame-duck presidency, Biden’s actions could significantly impede Trump’s ability to enact sweeping changes.
Read More
Stay informed on the 2024 US Presidential election with the FT’s comprehensive coverage, including news, analysis, and data. A free guide offers insights into the new administration, covering cabinet appointments and policy plans. Readers can also access in-depth perspectives and analysis on the state of democracy following record voter turnout. Explore the dedicated election hub and Democracy 2024 sections for complete coverage.
Read More
Trump believes his recent election victory grants him a mandate to fundamentally reshape America. However, a closer examination of history suggests a different narrative.
His claim rests on the premise that controlling the presidency, House, and Senate equates to an overwhelming popular mandate. Yet, this overlooks the crucial detail that he didn’t secure even a majority of the popular vote. Winning a plurality, even with control of both legislative chambers, hardly constitutes a resounding endorsement for sweeping change. To claim otherwise is a blatant misrepresentation of the electoral reality.
The narrow margin of his victory further weakens the “mandate” argument. Compared to previous presidential wins, his share of the popular vote was remarkably low.… Continue reading
Despite initial claims of a landslide victory, Donald Trump’s popular vote percentage has dropped below 50%, significantly narrowing his margin over Kamala Harris. His final popular vote share will likely be among the lowest for a winning president in recent history, contradicting his assertions of an “unprecedented and powerful mandate.” While he retains the presidency via the Electoral College, his significantly diminished popular vote margin undermines his claims of a decisive win.
Read More
President Zelensky believes a Trump presidency will expedite the end of the war in Ukraine, citing constructive dialogue and shared understanding of Ukraine’s peace vision. He emphasizes Ukraine’s independence and refusal to accept demands dictating its negotiating stance with Russia. While acknowledging the absence of a definitive end date, Zelensky anticipates a quicker resolution under the forthcoming Trump administration’s policies. This faster resolution, he states, is a key component of the incoming team’s approach and public pledge. A just peace, ensuring the sacrifices of Ukrainian citizens are not in vain, remains paramount.
Read More
While President Trump has repeatedly joked about serving more than two terms, his comments are lighthearted and not serious political pronouncements. Despite past quips about potentially running again in 2028, he has previously stated his intention to serve only one term, leaving office after his second term. Notably, he has also expressed his opposition to amending the Constitution to remove the two-term limit, indicating that he respects the constitutional framework surrounding presidential terms.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood