Trump says airspace above and surrounding Venezuela to be closed in its entirety, and the immediate reaction is a mix of disbelief, anger, and concern. Many are questioning the legality and the motives behind such a drastic move, especially given the historical context of the “America First” rhetoric. There’s a palpable sense of betrayal, with accusations that the former president is abandoning his promises and potentially dragging the country into another protracted and costly conflict. The question on everyone’s mind seems to be: why now, and why Venezuela?
The action is seen as a potential “act of war,” or a prelude to one, under US law, drawing attention to the potential implications of armed conflict.… Continue reading
Violence erupted in Mexico’s senate following a heated discussion concerning the presence of foreign troops. Opposition leader Alejandro “Alito” Moreno initiated a physical altercation with senate president Gerardo Fernández Noroña, escalating to include shoving and grabbing. The incident unfolded after a contentious debate where the ruling party accused the opposition of inviting US military intervention, a claim the opposition denied. In response to the violence, the senate leader plans to propose expelling Moreno and other lawmakers and has filed a criminal complaint.
Read More
The Houthi rebels in Yemen threatened renewed attacks on US ships if the US joins Israel in a war against Iran. This follows previous statements indicating the rebels’ consideration of increased strikes on US and Israeli targets in support of Iran. The threat is part of a broader response from the Iran-led Axis of Resistance, whose members have expressed intentions to retaliate against any US military intervention in the conflict. Previously, President Trump declared the Houthis had ceased attacking ships. However, the current threat underscores the precarious regional situation and the potential for wider conflict.
Read More
A recent Economist/YouGov poll reveals a significant portion of Americans—a full 60%—oppose U.S. military intervention in the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. This widespread disapproval underscores a palpable weariness regarding further entanglement in Middle Eastern affairs.
Only a small minority, 16%, voiced support for military action, leaving a sizable 24% undecided. The hesitation suggests a deep skepticism towards another potentially protracted and costly conflict, especially given the lingering negative perceptions of past interventions.
The current climate sharply contrasts with the public sentiment during the Iraq War in 2003. Back then, high presidential approval ratings and a perceived quick victory fueled support for military engagement.… Continue reading
Kataib Hezbollah, an Iran-backed Shia militia, issued a stark warning to the United States, threatening attacks on US bases across West Asia should the US intervene in the Iran-Israel conflict. The group’s security leader, Abu Ali al-Askari, specifically mentioned targeting key maritime routes and oil ports, in addition to US aircraft. This threat follows a January 2024 drone strike attributed to the group, killing US soldiers. President Trump stated he will decide within two weeks whether to authorize military action against Iran, prioritizing diplomatic solutions while maintaining that military options remain available.
Read More
Following Israel’s attack, Ayatollah Khamenei rejected US calls for Iranian surrender, warning of “irreparable damage” should the US intervene. Simultaneously, President Trump remained undecided on US military involvement, despite previous demands for unconditional surrender. Concerns center on Iran’s Fordow nuclear facility, whose destruction requires powerful US weaponry, prompting debate over US intervention and the potential long-term implications for Iran’s nuclear capabilities. International condemnation of the escalating conflict is widespread, with Russia and China expressing deep worry. The conflict continues with both sides sustaining losses and the situation remains highly volatile.
Read More
A recent poll revealed a stark reality: only 16% of Americans want the United States involved in a potential war between Israel and Iran. This surprisingly low figure underscores a widespread aversion to further military entanglement in the Middle East, a sentiment that transcends typical political divides.
The overwhelming majority, a full 84%, clearly express a desire to remain uninvolved. This widespread opposition suggests a deep-seated war-weariness, perhaps stemming from decades of costly conflicts in the region and a growing recognition of the human and financial toll such interventions exact.
Even within the Republican party, support for US involvement appears significantly lower than expected.… Continue reading
The US is moving fighter jets to the Middle East as the Israel-Iran conflict escalates, a development echoing past interventions in the region. This deployment isn’t entirely unexpected; such movements are common whenever tensions flare in the Middle East, providing readily available options should the President need to intervene or simply to bolster the aerial defense of allied nations. The current situation, however, feels different, charged with a sense of foreboding reminiscent of the 2003 Iraq War.
This time, there’s no manufactured pretext like 9/11; the conflict is openly declared, intensifying fears of a new protracted war. The potential for widespread conflict weighs heavily, especially for the younger generation who will bear the brunt of any potential military response, contrasting sharply with the “no more wars” rhetoric of certain politicians.… Continue reading
The U.S. Air Force’s deployment of over 30 KC-135 and KC-46 aerial refueling tankers from American bases to a region bordering the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict represents a significant development, potentially signaling a shift towards greater U.S. involvement. These tankers are strategically positioned to support potential operations, primarily focusing on refueling aircraft involved in the conflict.
This substantial deployment isn’t simply a matter of routine readiness; it directly addresses the range limitations of Western aircraft, including those used by Israel. While Israeli F-15s boast sufficient range to reach Iranian targets without refueling, the larger F-16 fleet requires aerial support for extended missions.… Continue reading
Following Israel’s preemptive strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and missile capabilities, Iran launched a retaliatory missile barrage toward Israel. Simultaneously, Iranian air defenses were activated, and missile and drone attacks were reported in Tehran. The U.S. military, having deployed assets to the region prior to the Israeli operation, assisted in intercepting Iranian missiles using systems including THAAD and Patriot batteries. Despite U.S. claims of non-involvement in the initial Israeli attacks, President Trump acknowledged U.S. awareness of the plan and expressed satisfaction with Israel’s use of American-made weaponry.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker