US withdraws from key UN human rights report, draws criticism from rights advocates.
It’s not exactly a shocker, but the news still stings. The United States is pulling out of the process of submitting its report to the UN’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR), the mechanism where countries’ human rights records are scrutinized. The US State Department confirmed this, citing an executive order from President Trump as the driving force. Apparently, the official rationale is that participating in the UPR somehow legitimizes the UN Human Rights Council, and that council is seen as failing to condemn serious human rights violations effectively. It’s worth noting the US is on course to be the first country not to deliver a report to the UPR.… Continue reading
The United States’ inclusion on a human rights watchlist, specifically CIVICUS’s monitor list, is a significant development sparking considerable debate. The nonprofit organization directly links this addition to actions taken by President Donald Trump since his return to office. This is undeniably a controversial move, raising questions about the state of human rights within the United States and the implications for its international standing.
This development has generated a wide spectrum of reactions. Some view it as a long-overdue recognition of the erosion of human rights under certain political administrations, arguing that the US has, for too long, avoided accountability for its actions on the world stage.… Continue reading
The CIVICUS Monitor has added the United States to its watchlist, citing a narrowing of civic space under the Trump administration. This designation reflects concerns over assaults on democratic norms, significant cuts to foreign aid, crackdowns on diversity initiatives, and intimidation tactics chilling dissent. While acknowledging some freedoms remain, CIVICUS points to government actions restricting free speech and press access, including instances of censorship and press pool manipulation. The White House rejects this assessment, but the “narrowed” classification reflects ongoing challenges to fundamental rights and freedoms.
Read More