In a recent interview, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed gratitude for the U.S.’s efforts to end the war but emphasized Russia’s longstanding ambition to dismantle American global leadership and economic power. He highlighted this as a continuation of Soviet-era policies, now resurrected under Putin’s rule, and asserted that Russia’s influence extends to former USSR states, with the ultimate goal being to target the United States. Zelenskyy further noted the alignment of Russia with Iran and North Korea in their shared antagonism towards the U.S., using the Ukraine conflict as a proxy battleground. This strategy, he argued, masks the weakness of Russia’s military, which has failed to decisively defeat Ukraine.
Read More
A potential arms package exceeding $100 billion is reportedly being considered for Saudi Arabia, a move that’s raising significant eyebrows. The sheer scale of the proposed deal is staggering, and the timing, given the recent history between the two nations, is certainly noteworthy.
This massive arms deal immediately brings to mind previous discussions about aid to Ukraine. While Ukraine has repeatedly requested and sometimes purchased, sometimes received as aid, weapons to defend against ongoing conflict, the justification for such a massive investment in Saudi Arabia’s military is much less clear. The implication is that ensuring Saudi Arabia’s security is somehow viewed as a more pressing priority, a perspective that invites many questions.… Continue reading
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte’s April 24th Washington visit aims to dissuade the U.S. from pressuring Ukraine into a peace deal unfavorable to Kyiv. This pressure stems from a controversial U.S. peace proposal reportedly including Russian annexation of Crimea and barring Ukraine from NATO. Rutte will argue that such a deal would embolden Russia and destabilize Europe, emphasizing the importance of upholding Ukraine’s sovereignty. He will also discuss NATO’s long-term defense strategy and burden-sharing among member states.
Read More
In response to reports of a U.S. peace proposal that would entail de jure recognition of Russia’s annexation of Crimea, Ukrainian President Zelensky reaffirmed Ukraine’s commitment to its constitutional principles and territorial integrity, citing a 2018 U.S. declaration condemning Russia’s actions. This statement follows previous Ukrainian rejection of territorial concessions and contrasts with reports suggesting a broader U.S. proposal encompassing de facto acceptance of Russian occupation in other Ukrainian regions. Despite heightened tensions, a London peace meeting proceeded, with Ukrainian officials emphasizing the importance of a ceasefire. The White House denied any request for Ukrainian recognition of Crimea as Russian territory.
Read More
A proposed US-brokered peace deal, reportedly including US recognition of Crimea and Russian-occupied territories since 2022, represents a near-total capitulation to Russia’s demands. This would effectively reward Russian aggression and establish a new global paradigm where territorial gains are legitimized through force. The deal also includes the lifting of US sanctions on Russia and increased US-Russia cooperation, significantly bolstering Russia’s economic and military capabilities. Ukraine’s rejection of this proposal is understandable, as it would effectively erase its sovereignty and dismantle the post-war European order. The only remaining hope lies in Europe’s independent defense of its values.
Read More
President Zelensky urged the U.S. to remain engaged in peace talks despite Secretary Rubio’s announcement of a potential withdrawal if a deal isn’t imminent. Rubio indicated that a Trump-backed peace plan, demanding significant Ukrainian concessions including ceding territory and abandoning NATO aspirations, is facing resistance from Kyiv. Zelensky’s rejection of recognizing Crimea as Russian has already led to the downgrading of a planned London summit. This situation highlights the precarious nature of the peace process and the high stakes involved. The potential U.S. withdrawal represents a significant risk to Ukraine.
Read More
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff withdrew from London ceasefire talks, opting instead for separate engagements in Moscow. The downgraded London meeting will proceed with officials from the UK, France, Germany, and Ukraine. Discussions center around a potential Russian halt to the invasion in exchange for concessions, although Ukraine firmly rejects recognizing Crimea as Russian territory. Despite Russia’s claims of a ceasefire, attacks continued, highlighting the ongoing uncertainty and complexity of the negotiations.
Read More
High-level talks in London between the UK, US, France, Germany, and Ukraine regarding the war in Ukraine have been postponed. Senior officials will now meet instead, though the Ukrainian foreign minister will still attend a bilateral meeting. This shift follows increased pressure from the Trump administration for a ceasefire, including a US proposal that would recognize Russia’s annexation of Crimea and freeze frontlines—a proposal rejected by Ukraine. While Putin reportedly offered to halt fighting along current lines, leaving 20% of Ukraine under Russian control, the US has threatened to withdraw from talks if a deal isn’t reached soon.
Read More
The US instructing its diplomats in Vietnam to avoid war anniversary events is a perplexing move, seemingly driven by factors far removed from sound diplomatic strategy. It feels like a deliberate attempt to unravel years of painstaking efforts to build a stronger relationship, ignoring the demonstrably positive feelings many Vietnamese people hold towards Americans, even amidst periods of trade tensions. This action evokes a sense of pettiness, a disregard for the sensitivities surrounding the war and its legacy, and potentially, a far more sinister underlying motive.
The decision isn’t simply a matter of overlooking a historical event; it carries the weight of a perceived insult, a snub that could significantly damage already fragile trust.… Continue reading
A Reuters/Ipsos poll reveals that 59% of Americans believe President Trump is harming U.S. global credibility, a sentiment shared by about one-third of Republicans. This coincides with a low 42% approval rating for Trump, the lowest since his return to office. His foreign policy, marked by shifting alliances, appeasement of Russia, and undermining of Ukraine support, is a key driver of this negative perception. The poll highlights a growing partisan divide, with Republicans showing decreased concern about Russia and the war in Ukraine.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood